Thomas Paradies wrote:
While using the xdoclet ojb module (v1.0.0) I'm running into the same problem
as described in an older message from 2003 - see
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=7009.
Following the thread I found an response - but no solution... In resumption
of th
While using the xdoclet ojb module (v1.0.0) I'm running into the same problem
as described in an older message from 2003 - see
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=7009.
Following the thread I found an response - but no solution... In resumption
of this thread I append a sh
hi ,all:
how can I send my questions to all of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~
mqg
__
Find a Chinese Souvenir, Just Click Here：
http://www.souvenirchina.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using the xdoclet ojb module to generate an ojb repository and a torque
schema. The problem that I am running into is that the foreign key
reference constraints are not generated for collections. My persistent
collections are only implementing 1:n associations. The foreign key
reference con
The tags look ok, however you only supplied the collection comment. This
might sound trivial but is there an experimentId field (that also has an
ojb.field tag) in the element class or one of its subclasses ? Do you
get any errors from the xdoclet ojb module ? (try ant -v to see some
more outpu
I am using the xdoclet ojb module to generate an ojb repository and a
torque schema. The problem that I am running into is that the foreign
key reference constraints are not generated for ojb collections within
the torque schema. The foreign key reference constraints are generated
for ojb referen
I am using the xdoclet ojb module to generate an ojb repository and a
torque schema. The problem that I am running into is that the foreign
key reference constraints are not generated for ojb collections within
the torque schema. The foreign key reference constraints are generated
for ojb referen
