Hi, Thomas:
This is the example I've cooked up previously and now
tested:
- Super Class -
package test;
/**
* Layer Super Type
*/
public abstract class BaseBO
{
/**
* @ojb.field column="n_id"
* primarykey="true"
*/
protected int id;
}
-
I thought I had that working ... Could you supply an testable example
(some classes) ?
To 1.:
You're right, they are leftover, I will fix it as soon as I can.
To 2.:
This is probably due to a limitation of the torque build file.
Basically, the create-db task will search in the directory
${torque
I thought I had that working ... Could you supply an example (some
classes) that I can test against ?
To 1.:
You're right, they are leftover, I will fix it as soon as I can.
To 2.:
This is probably due to a limitation of the torque build file.
Basically, the create-db task will search in the dir
>
>
>
> Setting up the build was more of a challenge. We
> found that simply dropping the modules into a
> current xdoclet 1.2b2 installation was a bad idea. I
> remember some error messages about
> ifHasMemberWithTag on line 10 of
> intermediate-representation.
e 2
xdoclet distributions used by our build script at the moment, a proper xdoclet 1.2b2
version and an ojbdoclet minimal version. I get the impression this little method of
building will no longer be necessary when the ojbdoclet bits become part of the main
xdoclet distribution.
Hope that helps
G
Hi,
I wonder if anyone checked out the xdoclet module for
OJB? I tried it and it seems that there's some
problems with fields inherited from superclass.
Basically, if a field of the superclass is marked by
ojb.field tag, but the superclass itself is not marked
by ojb.class, then this field will no
