Hi Armin, hi Gerhard,
thank you for the answer.
As I already wrote in my question, that i am using OJB since the last 1 and
1/2 years. I saved a lot of time using this mapping tool. In addition it is
a good feeling to get answers to problems so fast.
Nikolaus.
-
Hi,
i am using OJB since 1 and 1/2 years. This week i want to move from Version
1.0 to 1.0.1.
I detect the following problem:
I have two objects of two different classes (aClass and bClass) with the
same base class. I use strings as primary keys. Object a has the string
'WR' as pk, object b
I've spotted this problem last week using Timestamp as primary Key. Here
was my mail:
>Hi everyone.
> I have a DB2 table that has a Timestamp column as primary key. My
OJB
>code was just right with the OJB 1.0.0 version. I've tried to upgrade the
>OJB to the 1.0.1 version. For some reason (I
Hi Armin,
never mind, I should have posted this earlier. (And I did learn a lot from OJB,
by the way :-)
Ok, our buildKey method looks like this:
private Object buildKey(Identity oid)
{
switch (cachingKeyType)
{
case 0 :
return new OrderedTuple(oid);
case 1 :
Hi Gerhard and Nikolaus,
> hashCode() as keys into a Hashtable. Since hash codes of different
objects can
> be equal, this sooner or later had to fail.
>
sorry this was my fault I only think about PK values of type Integer
(here #hashCode and #equals has same result) and best performance,
compl
Hi Nikolaus,
This is copied from ObjectCacheDefaultImpl:
private Integer buildKey(Identity oid)
{
int key = 0;
switch(cachingKeyType)
{
case 0:
key = oid.hashCode();
break;
case 1:
key = new
Ha
Hi,
i am using OJB since 1 and 1/2 years. This week i tried to move from
Version 1.0 to 1.0.1.
I detected the following problem:
I have two objects of two different classes (aClass and bClass) with the
same base class.
I use strings as primary keys. Object a has the string 'WR' as pk, object
