Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-05 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
hi steve, i'm happy it solved your problem. you can define relationships or fields in any class-descriptor, abstract or concrete. in your case you need it in the abstract because of A pointing to S. but if you would query for all B or C pointing to a D (ie. D.name) then the definition in concre

Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-04 Thread Steve Clark
nues" >> >> Although you are using an ODMG query, when the query is parsed, it does >> generate a standard QueryByCriteria. QueryByCriteria was getting the >> wrong >> class descriptor when paths of > 1 sement were used. This would lead >> to the >>

Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-04 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
name being passed to the query, as opposed to the column name. Jakob fixed this in CVS last night. This May Be A Red Herring. Cheers, Charles. -Original Message- From: Steve Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 March 2004 19:56 To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Extent problem with

Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-04 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
ttribute name being passed to the query, as opposed to the column name. Jakob fixed this in CVS last night. This May Be A Red Herring. Cheers, Charles. -Original Message- From: Steve Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 March 2004 19:56 To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Extent problem

RE: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-04 Thread Gelhar, Wallace Joseph
: OJB Users List Subject: RE: Extent problem with ODMG Charles, Thanks for the suggestion. I have tried CVS HEAD and I still get the same incorrect behavior. I'm still unclear whether OJB even *expects* to get this query right, because it doesn't know that 'com' is a

RE: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-04 Thread Steve Clark
night. > -Original Message----- > From: Steve Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 March 2004 19:56 > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: Extent problem with ODMG > > > I'm still having this problem, so I'm going to try again. > > Using ODMG, RC5,

RE: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-03 Thread Charles Anthony
-- > From: Steve Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 March 2004 19:56 > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: Extent problem with ODMG > > > I'm still having this problem, so I'm going to try again. > > Using ODMG, RC5, Oracle 9i. > > Summary: >

Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-03-03 Thread Steve Clark
I'm still having this problem, so I'm going to try again. Using ODMG, RC5, Oracle 9i. Summary: - Class A has a 1-to-1 relationship 'abs' to an abstract superclass S - Class S has concrete subclasses B and C - Classes B and C share a common relationship 'com' to another cla

Re: Extent problem with ODMG

2004-02-20 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
hi steve, imo OQL is not the problem here. have you tried to query for AccomplishmentImp, just to see if 'site' can be resolved ? may be you should use the latest from repository. jakob Steve Clark wrote: I'm having a problem with extents in ODMG. OJB is generating incorrect (and, in fact, in