RE: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-20 Thread Vincenz Braun
Field? Thanks, Vincenz > -Original Message- > From: Jakob Braeuchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:45 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again) > > > hi vincenz, > >

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-16 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again) hi vincent, just to make it clear the attribute 'userId' is null because access is anonymous and no attribute is required in your class. the attribute 'user' should contain an instance of object User. i do have a testcase for

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-15 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
ct to be materialized from the PB to return the correct field values? Thank you very much, Vincenz -Original Message- From: Jakob Braeuchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:42 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (

RE: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-14 Thread Vincenz Braun
the PB to return the correct field values? Thank you very much, Vincenz > -Original Message- > From: Jakob Braeuchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:42 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (ag

Antwort: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-14 Thread Gerhard . Grosse
t;OJB Users List" An: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopie: Thema: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again) hi gerhard, yup, it also works with proxy=false. do you use the latest from repository ? jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-14 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
Jakob Braeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 13.10.2003 20:42 Bitte antworten an "OJB Users List" An: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopie: Thema: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again) hi vincent, just to make it clear the attri

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-14 Thread Gerhard . Grosse
OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kopie: Thema: Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again) hi vincent, just to make it clear the attribute 'userId' is null because access is anonymous and no attribute is required in your class. the attribute '

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-13 Thread Jakob Braeuchi
hi vincent, just to make it clear the attribute 'userId' is null because access is anonymous and no attribute is required in your class. the attribute 'user' should contain an instance of object User. i do have a testcase for this feature and it works. ... collection-class="o

Re: Problem with anonymous keys in 1:n back-mapping (again)

2003-10-13 Thread Brian McCallister
I am looking into it. I presume you are using the PB api based on the auto-* being set. I have an almost identical mapping that works fine, but am using the OTM... I'll play with it against the PB tonight with the auto-* set they way you do and see what I can find. If there is no bug open on it