Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-21 Thread Armin Waibel
. regards, Armin - Original Message - From: Ryan Vanderwerf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OJB Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Armin Waibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:25 PM Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too I've put the following fix

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-19 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
). Thanks again, Ryan -Original Message- From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:49 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Hi Ryan, maybe it's a caching problem. In SequenceGenerator

Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-19 Thread Armin Waibel
PM Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Thanks Armin, caching was definitely the problem! The problem with that fix is that it wipes out the entire application cache for OJB each time you get a sequence, obviously not a very elegant solution. A fix

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-18 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
I've upgrades to 0.9.9 and I can verify this is still happening.I make a copy of a test table that I write to, and I have 2 servlet engines writing to the same database, the each instance of OJB of each server overwrites the OJB_HL_SEQ with conflicting values for each app server. This causes 2

Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-18 Thread Armin Waibel
Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:50 AM Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too I've upgrades to 0.9.9 and I can verify this is still happening.I make a copy of a test table that I write to, and I have 2 servlet engines writing