Thanks Armin, your reply is very helpfull.
so there is no direct solution we must call store two time , one for A
another for B.
in your opinion why is not possible to use the same philosophy of the
invers-foreignekey wich is used in 1:n
an other question about performance this time :
i
Hi,
ABOU LINA wrote:
Thanks Armin, your reply is very helpfull.
so there is no direct solution we must call store two time , one for A
another for B.
in your opinion why is not possible to use the same philosophy of the
invers-foreignekey wich is used in 1:n
Assume you are using database
Hi,
i give you this sample example :
in case AB [1:n] :
the mapping of this bidiractional navigation is guaranted by the use of
inverse-foreignkey :
Mapping A classe :
collection-descriptor
name=allB
Hi,
ABOU LINA wrote:
Hi,
i give you this sample example :
in case AB [1:n] :
the mapping of this bidiractional navigation is guaranted by the use of
inverse-foreignkey :
Mapping A classe :
collection-descriptor
