RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-21 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
great improvement from what I was running on 0.9.7. Ryan -Original Message- From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 3:34 AM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Hi Ryan, indeed that's a better

Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-21 Thread Armin Waibel
ecific time period. regards, Armin - Original Message - From: "Ryan Vanderwerf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Armin Waibel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:25 PM Subject: RE: is this

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-20 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
OJB Users List Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Hi Ryan, > The problem with that fix is that it wipes out the entire application > cache for OJB each time you get a sequence, obviously not a very elegant > solution. Yes, a really dirty hack! A solution

Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-19 Thread Armin Waibel
>; "Armin Waibel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:11 PM Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Thanks Armin, caching was definitely the problem! The problem with that fix is that it wipes out the entire application ca

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-19 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
ng on data). Thanks again, Ryan -Original Message- From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:49 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too Hi Ryan, maybe it's a caching problem. In Se

Re: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-18 Thread Armin Waibel
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:50 AM Subject: RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too I've upgrades to 0.9.9 and I can verify this is still happening.I make a copy of a test

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) - happens in 0.9.9 too

2003-02-18 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
ger since it has to get the ID after the insert instead of before. Ryan -Original Message- From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:08 AM To: 'OJB Users List' Subject: AW: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) Hi Ryan, > > I&

RE: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing)

2003-02-14 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
og and see if I can 'catch' it in the act. Ryan -Original Message- From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:08 AM To: 'OJB Users List' Subject: AW: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing) Hi Ryan, > > I've experie

AW: is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing)

2003-02-14 Thread Mahler Thomas
Hi Ryan, > > I've experienced a weird problem in my servlet environment > (caucho resin > 1.2.6, RH8, sql server 2k, 0.9.7 using PB API) with the sequence > manager. Until recently my application has run on 1 > application server, > with a grab size of 10 for sequences (I'm using the HI_LO seq

is this an old .97 bug? (sequencing)

2003-02-13 Thread Ryan Vanderwerf
I've experienced a weird problem in my servlet environment (caucho resin 1.2.6, RH8, sql server 2k, 0.9.7 using PB API) with the sequence manager. Until recently my application has run on 1 application server, with a grab size of 10 for sequences (I'm using the HI_LO seq manager) which was working