> On March 5, 2012, 10:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I don't think i like this much.
> > * Who is painting that 'first frame' image? What if there is none?
> > * It seems to me that show(); setActive(false); setActive(true); will
> > result in stuff still not being shown, doesn't look
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104159/
---
(Updated March 7, 2012, 3:07 p.m.)
Review request for Okular and Albert As
> On March 5, 2012, 10:34 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I don't think i like this much.
> > * Who is painting that 'first frame' image? What if there is none?
> > * It seems to me that show(); setActive(false); setActive(true); will
> > result in stuff still not being shown, doesn't look
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295504
Bug ID: 295504
Severity: critical
Version: unspecified
Priority: NOR
Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
Summary: crash printing to pdf format
Classification: Unclassified
OS:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295506
Bug ID: 295506
Severity: wishlist
Version: 0.12.5
Priority: NOR
Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
Summary: Make Okular remember the last "View Mode" and
"Continous" status f