BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20kf5-qt5%20WindowsMSVCQt5.9/43/
Project:
Applications okular kf5-qt5 WindowsMSVCQt5.9
Date of build:
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 03:11:48 +
Build duration:
1 hr 48 min and counting
CONSOLE O
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.7/93/
Project:
Applications okular kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.7
Date of build:
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 03:11:48 +
Build duration:
1 hr 4 min and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL
https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20kf5-qt5%20FedoraQt5.8/87/
Project:
Applications okular kf5-qt5 FedoraQt5.8
Date of build:
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 03:11:48 +
Build duration:
5 min 29 sec and counting
CONSOLE OUTPUT
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385456
--- Comment #8 from bbdn...@gmail.com ---
poppler 0.60.1-1 is installed.
poppler-data is 0.4.8-1.
Distribution is Arch Linux.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
aacid added a comment.
Please consider fixing this in Qt before asking us to create a workaround.
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415
To: trufanov, ngraham, #okular
Cc: aacid, progwolff
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385456
--- Comment #7 from Albert Astals Cid ---
which poppler version are you using?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385468
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Dawson ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #5)
> (In reply to Matthew Dawson from comment #4)
> > Also, if the configuration update script is for KDE4 configuration files,
> > you can skip putting a Version=5 head
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386110
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377487
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385458
Simon Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simonandr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386111
Bug ID: 386111
Summary: Selecting text moves it one pixel towards the bottom
Product: okular
Version: 1.2.70
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
sander added a comment.
I still cannot reproduce Albert's problems locally, but after reading
Christoph's link (thanks!) I found out that I can move the upper left corner of
the border one pixel towards the lower right without uncovering the yellow
rectangle. Please somebody test whether th
sander updated this revision to Diff 21180.
sander added a comment.
Move the top left corner of the dark border one pixel towards the lower right.
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D7662?vs=19101&id=21180
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386110
Bug ID: 386110
Summary: ctrl+f highlighting only works for low zoom levels
Product: okular
Version: 1.2.70
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
trufanov added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415#158804, @aacid wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix this in QImageReader and not in every
user of QImageReader ?
It also might be libpng problem which Qt uses under the hood. As stated in
original bug report
progwolff added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415#158804, @aacid wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix this in QImageReader and not in every
user of QImageReader ?
From my perspective the behaviour of QImageReader is correct.
QImage::read docs:
> Read
aacid added a comment.
Wouldn't it make more sense to fix this in QImageReader and not in every user
of QImageReader ?
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415
To: trufanov, ngraham, #okular
Cc: aacid, progwolff
progwolff added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415#158800, @trufanov wrote:
> Also I heard I can add
> Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415
> in commit message to automatically close phabricator review. Is it so?
This is true, but it must be t
trufanov added a comment.
Ok, I've edited summary. Didn't know that KDE Bugs could be referred in a
such way in phabricator summary instead of commit message.
Also I heard I can add
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415
in commit message to automatically close phabrica
trufanov edited the summary of this revision.
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8415
To: trufanov, ngraham, #okular
Cc: aacid
aacid added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D8379#157771, @rkflx wrote:
> That's a really great feature Okular's user will surely love. Does this
solve https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344081?
Yes
> When testing (with https://phabricator.kde.org/D8378 and
https
aacid updated this revision to Diff 21161.
aacid added a comment.
Add BUGS
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8379?vs=21160&id=21161
BRANCH
updateCallback (branched from master)
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D8379
AFFECTED FI
aacid updated this revision to Diff 21160.
aacid added a comment.
Fix pixmaps not getting updated when the tile manager kicks in
Also make the tile request be partially updated if that's what the request
wants
REPOSITORY
R223 Okular
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.
23 matches
Mail list logo