D9328: Add support for cancellable image rendering and text extraction

ervin accepted this revision. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. REPOSITORY R223 Okular BRANCH cancellable (branched from master) REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D9328 To: aacid, ervin Cc: ervin, michaelweghorn, ngraham, #okular, gassaf, aacid

D8838: Don't request pixmaps twice when opening okular

aacid abandoned this revision. aacid added a comment. Abandoning in favor of https://phabricator.kde.org/D9328 REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D8838 To: aacid Cc: michaelweghorn, rkflx, #okular, gassaf, ngraham, aacid

D9328: Add support for cancellable image rendering and text extraction

aacid added a subscriber: rkflx. aacid added a comment. @ngraham @rkflx It would be great if you could find some time "soon" to review this i have work-work-time assigned for this, but as far as i understand only this month, so if you find there's changes needed it would be great if it c

KDE CI: Applications okular stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.9 - Build # 12 - Fixed!

BUILD SUCCESS Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20stable-kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.9/12/ Project: Applications okular stable-kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.9 Date of build: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:05:31 + Build duration: 1 hr 54 min and counting JUn

[okular] [Bug 388998] New: Go->Back gets you to wrong position after following internal link

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388998 Bug ID: 388998 Summary: Go->Back gets you to wrong position after following internal link Product: okular Version: 1.2.1 Platform: Fedora RPMs OS: Linux

KDE CI: Applications okular kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.9 - Build # 16 - Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.9/16/ Project: Applications okular kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.9 Date of build: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:05:55 + Build duration: 2 hr 42 min and counting JUnit Tests

[okular] [Bug 377151] View mode is transferred to other open documents

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377151 k...@mailinator.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@mailinator.com -- You are receiving

[okular] [Bug 388854] A very big volume of RAM

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |CONFIRMED Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO

[okular] [Bug 388854] A very big volume of RAM

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment #4 from Albert As

[okular] [Bug 388854] A very big volume of RAM

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #5 from Nate Graham --- Yes, but is the amount reasonable? 1.17 Gb RAM / 257 pages = 4.5 Mb per page, for a document that's only 3.2 Mb on disk. This PDF is mostly text and a few graphics. When I perform the same procedure in Evince, it to

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|A very big volume of RAM|Okular uses a very large |

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #6 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > Yes, but is the amount reasonable? You have it available, do you prefer the memory to lay around being unused? > 1.17 Gb RAM / 257 pages = 4.5 Mb per page, for a doc

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|CONFIRMED

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #8 from Nate Graham --- If you don't see any problems with Okular's memory usage, then go ahead and close the bug. No reason to leave it open if we don't intend to make any changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assig

Re: Google Summer of Code project candidates

El dilluns, 15 de gener de 2018, a les 6:14:08 CET, Oliver Sander va escriure: > > Anything else? > > How about support for signed pdf files? > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233806 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315930 These seem a bit "too hard" for a GSOC in my opinion > Or f

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #9 from Albert Astals Cid --- Question since you changed the subject of the bug, have you verified that there is actually no memory bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #10 from Albert Astals Cid --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #9) > Question since you changed the subject of the bug, have you verified that > there is actually no memory bug? memory bug -> memory leak -- You are receiving t

[okular] [Bug 388854] Okular uses a very large amount of RAM for caching

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388854 --- Comment #11 from Nate Graham --- Yes, I opened Okular with the document and left it open for a few hours. I didn't observe any memory leak; usage was static. So I assumed that the reporter was referring to memory consumed by actually using Okular.

[okular] [Bug 351408] printing BROKEN - pdf files from publishers

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351408 Michael Weghorn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de --- Comment #1 from Micha