[okular] [Bug 396002] Review/Annotation tool selection with double click not persisting on page scroll

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396002 Oliver Sander changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC|

[okular] [Bug 396004] Duplex settings are ignored for HP Laserjet PCL based printer driver

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396004 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[okular] [Bug 396004] Duplex settings are ignored for HP Laserjet PCL based printer driver

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396004 --- Comment #1 from MichaelOF --- Issue can be closed. Happens only with (old) driver "HP LaserJet 2200 Series, hpcups 3.15.2", seems to be kept when upgrading from older OpenSuse versions. OpenSuse 15.0 now has "HP LaserJet 2200 pcl3, hpcups 3.17.9"

[okular] [Bug 396004] New: Duplex settings are ignored for HP Laserjet PCL based printer driver

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396004 Bug ID: 396004 Summary: Duplex settings are ignored for HP Laserjet PCL based printer driver Product: okular Version: 1.3.3 Platform: openSUSE RPMs OS: Linux

[okular] [Bug 394917] Confusing message about ‘internal storage’

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394917 --- Comment #2 from Erik Quaeghebeur --- (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1) > Your message seems nice, the last sentence can't be "pdf file" since it > needs to be generic, so it'll be just "file". Certainly. > And i think "this kind of st

KDE CI: Applications okular kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.10 - Build # 27 - Still Unstable!

BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL https://build.kde.org/job/Applications%20okular%20kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.10/27/ Project: Applications okular kf5-qt5 FreeBSDQt5.10 Date of build: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:46:28 + Build duration: 12 min and counting JUnit Tests N

D10974: Add option to ignore print margins

arthurpeters added a comment. I like "Fit to printable area". I think the idea of the area that is "printable" is accurate and clear. A tooltip specifying that the area we are talking about is the area that the //printer// can print might be useful. The "opposite" is more complex. The pr

[okular] [Bug 396002] New: Review/Annotation tool selection with double click not persisting on page scroll

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396002 Bug ID: 396002 Summary: Review/Annotation tool selection with double click not persisting on page scroll Product: okular Version: 1.4.2 Platform: RedHat RPMs OS: L

D10974: Add option to ignore print margins

michaelweghorn added a comment. I might have missed something, but I'm not yet sure what the "correct" wording for the two options in the radio button or combobox would be. :-) Trying to stick with what Evince uses, "Fit to printable area" might be one. Is this one OK? Should the other

D10974: Add option to ignore print margins

ngraham added a comment. In D10974#284801 , @aacid wrote: > Do you think we can agree on those? +1 no objection so we can move this forward. REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D10974 To: michaelweghor

[okular] [Bug 394917] Confusing message about ‘internal storage’

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394917 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Albert As

D10974: Add option to ignore print margins

aacid added a comment. Yeah, maybe having two options in a combo/radio is better than just having one checkbox. that way since we have two options it's easier to explain what happens when the checkbox is not checked since we have the alternate option text. I do like trying to have simil