https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250728
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250728
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #28 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2010-01-08 11:02:57 ---
Opinions don't really count for much.
Do you have any usability research that evaluates this issue? (there was a fair
amount of usability work - I don't remember
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220749
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155695
--- Comment #34 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-12-22 20:56:12 ---
Given the abuse that occurred, I think I have higher priorities.
Someone else may be working on it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158113
--- Comment #8 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-12-17 21:34:04 ---
I'm not aware of anyone working on this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 08:00:38 Werner wrote:
wish:
please let okular show in the upper window-frame the filename.
For the file „file.ps“, there does appear „file.pdf“ instead.
(Could be „file.ps shown as pdf“)
If file.pdf is shown is because that's the name reported by the
On Wednesday 09 December 2009 21:04:13 Barna Daniel wrote:
the other (much simpler) option is probably to have the
possibility to 'Save As' single (or a defined range) of pages from okular,
and then insert them one-by-one into openoffice. This could be a useful
feature on its own as well.
If
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aman...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216944
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216635
--- Comment #1 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-11-30 09:27:50 ---
Your request is a bit terse. Can you explain why you are looking for this, and
how you think this would work?
For example, what happens if you open an archive file
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216635
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159005
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184399
--- Comment #4 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-11-12 23:08:25 ---
Is this a duplicate of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156380 ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214175
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195083
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schma...@ifrit.eu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214175
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-11-12 02:57:39 ---
Please attach a document showing the problem, so we can investigate it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213756
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213578
--- Comment #4 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-11-09 10:30:14 ---
Please understand that the heading on the summary panel isn't the same heading
as shown on the page. They come from different sources in the file.
Can you explain why you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213578
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211227
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211227
--- Comment #4 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-10-22 00:19:31 ---
Sorry, should have known better.
The results in comment #2 were from 0.10.7 (distro packages from Fedora 11).
I grabbed poppler from git (so post 0.12.1), and rebuilt
On Monday 19 October 2009 11:21:06 Pino Toscano wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210882
--- Comment #2 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2009-10-19 02:21:06 ---
SVN commit 1037415 by pino:
check the actual mime type names and not their pointers
will be in kde 4.3.3
CCBUG: 210882
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210882
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-10-19 14:03:02 ---
On Monday 19 October 2009 11:21:06 Pino Toscano wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210882
--- Comment #2 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2009-10-19 02:21:06
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 06:08:42 davidginzb...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185532
--- Comment #12 from davidginzburg gmail com 2009-10-12 21:08:38 ---
It is not a duplicate.The letters appear ok only reversed
I will provide a sample tomorrow when im near the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155695
--- Comment #24 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-09-07 12:01:35 ---
Julian,
Someone else in the KDE community is scarcely likely to encourage personal
attacks on developers (since didn't respond on my mail nor does he seem to
worry about
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205863
--- Comment #1 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-09-01 23:46:29 ---
Hi.
Thanks for reporting this issue.
I don't think we support DNG or NEF formats. Possibly they are coming in via
the kimgio or tiff backends.
Can you advise how you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200398
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193916
--- Comment #14 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-07-16 01:31:24 ---
Dan Connor
This bug is about fonts in ODT documents, not in PDF documents. In any case,
your dash shows up fine for me using poppler 0.10.5 (on Fedora 11). Note
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27
--- Comment #5 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-07-13 14:40:02 ---
The bit about Shall I try to contact an authority such as Oxford for an
official opinion? came across as obnoxious and appeared to be an attempt at
superiority (rather than
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 16:00:34 Navneet Sankara wrote:
Hi
Hello,
I wasn't sure if this mail belonged in the Okular Development mailing list.
So I had sent a personal mail to Pino first, which I didn't get any reply
to. I am an avid user of your software and I have a few ideas for
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 20:12:56 Navneet Sankara wrote:
Thanks Brad.
I have entered them as Bugs 199401, 199403 and 199405. Hope that helps!
It does.
I'd also like to reiterate what I said at the end of my last mail.
I am an undergrad EE student with some programming experience, but no
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199250
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198121
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198035
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196197
--- Comment #9 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-06-13 14:41:20 ---
I think you need to think about the misleading help is worse than no help
angle.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196197
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|br...@frogmouth.net |
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #80 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-05-31 02:17:54 ---
This bug is still open, so you should not expect that everything discussed is
implemented.
For the current state, you might like to review
http://docs.kde.org/stable/en
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193657
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171463
--- Comment #8 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-05-24 01:20:00 ---
Kamil,
Those are not the same issue as this bug. If you want your issues to be
addressed, it would be better to raise a new bug report.
Brad
--
Configure bugmail: https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185296
--- Comment #20 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-05-24 04:06:48 ---
It would be nice if someone besides Pino Toscano could look at this bug as he
was clearly not willing to take it seriously.
I might, but I don't care to volunteer my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155515
--- Comment #22 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-05-18 08:57:11 ---
Personally I can't imagine this would be too hard to code, and in any other
tabbed application the tab bar is hidden if only one document is open, so it
shouldn't cause any
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190336
Brad Hards br...@frogmouth.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190336
--- Comment #2 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-04-22 23:24:04 ---
[Tilman: Please make sure your responses go back to the bug report.]
OP reported that the document can be obtained at:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190336
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-04-22 23:26:57 ---
I had some trouble (crashing consistent with the original report) with an older
Fedora 9 install using qt4.4.
After upgrading (to get matching debug packages) I found
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 03:46:49 am Dudy Kohen wrote:
I received an Email with an xps file in Hebrew.
The problem is that the Hebrew is reversed in the display.
You mean, it is shown left to right, when it should be right to left, or
individual characters are reversed?
Is this a known
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181054
--- Comment #1 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-01-17 11:02:15 ---
Is the document publicly available? If not, can you reproduce with another
document?
Can you also provide the backtrace associated with the crash? You may need to
install
Coverity says that there is a path through doFilePrint that can result in
returning an uninitialised value (in this case, ret).
(I agree: look at the path through line 83:
if ( res ) ret = 0;
If res is not true, then ret won't be initialised.)
See run 183 for this one.
We
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154980
--- Comment #10 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-01-06 07:48:30 ---
SVN commit 906395 by bhards:
General improvements to visual rendering of .odt
documents.
We can now (more) correctly render cell widths,
documents containing more than
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 01:52:10 am Pino Toscano wrote:
Tested the patch with the (not many) documents I have, and no problems
found so far. Some problems are left (like the levels in the lists in
testcase of #154980) yet, but we can live with those in KDE 4.2.0.
Thanks for the review.
Will
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156892
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-01-04 11:59:44 ---
Mohd: Can you please respond to the questions identified in comment #2?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179447
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:36:35 pm Brad Hards wrote:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154980
2. We don't support the start, end and justify alignment types.
This is in section 14.5.4 Text Align of my ODF spec (which is
version 1.0)
OK, first patch. I have tested the Left-to-Right path
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154980
--- Comment #9 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2009-01-04 01:34:27 ---
SVN commit 905238 by bhards:
Add support for the justify, start and end text alignment
modes.
Partly addresses rendering problems identified at
http://bugs.kde.org
On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:36:35 pm Brad Hards wrote:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154980
1. We aren't handling the different alignment of elements within a single
cell. So the first cell in the second row should render something like:
BOH
MAH
CHI LO SA
But we
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154980
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@frogmouth.net
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170427
--- Comment #10 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-12-04 07:21:16 ---
Darryl: have you tried installing debug packages? If your backtrace doesn't
match the one provided, you need to raise a new bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176513
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|UPSTREAM|WORKSFORME
--- Comment #19
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173896
--- Comment #1 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-12-01 02:47:58 ---
The kpdf equivalent request to this was #126066.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157130
--- Comment #6 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-12-01 02:54:23 ---
Ildar: are you still seeing this with a current version of Okular (and Qt)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158706
--- Comment #5 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-12-01 02:56:40 ---
Can you please try with a more recent Poppler version (ideally 0.10.1)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159276
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176320
--- Comment #9 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-11-29 23:46:09 ---
Dario: I was trying to figure out whether it could be caused by some patches
applied to freetype (Ubuntu / Debian has 107K diff applied, most of which looks
harmless, but I
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103568
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|okular-devel@kde.org
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174447
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163117
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168678
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175514
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-11-20 04:12:11 ---
What window managers (e.g. kwin) are you using on each machine?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175276
--- Comment #1 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-11-16 10:42:01 ---
Can you try with a 3 (or more) page document? Is the problem that the reverse
side is not printed, or that the last page is not printed?
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174447
--- Comment #4 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-11-08 11:38:41 ---
Hmm, tried to fix this (with several varieties of
---
/home/bradh/devel/kde-src/kdegraphics/okular/generators/tiff/generator_tiff.cpp
(revision 881437)
+++
/home/bradh
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174647
--- Comment #2 from Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net 2008-11-09 06:20:25 ---
This kind of non-arrow key navigation doesn't seem like something that should
be specific to one application. Perhaps would make more sense as a theme or
setting in kdelibs
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174447
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173411
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173411
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 10:30:25 pm you wrote:
Hey,
sorry for the delay.
Brad Hards schrieb:
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 10:52:46 pm q000te wrote:
Hi,
It should work with darkroom:
http://cberger.net/Programs/Darkroom.html
but i couldn't compile it yet..
Does
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171156
Brad Hards bradh frogmouth net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 11 September 2008 08:16:05 am Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dijous 11 Setembre 2008, Markus Grabner va escriure:
I like Ivo's proposal to use QCryptographicHash, which supports MD4, MD5,
and Sha1, so these are natural candidates.
It's not an attacker, it's you having two files that
On Tuesday 26 August 2008 12:18:01 am Tobias Koenig wrote:
Yes, example attached.
Neither of those will load for me.
I appear to have the plucker generator (builds, installs) and the desktop
files. Plucker appears as a supported file type, but the .pdb files don't
appear to be recognised as a
G'day team,
Qt 4.5 offers us an easy way to write an ODF text file from a QTextDocument. A
few of our generators have such a thing. So here is the easy patch
This only applies to those deriving from Okular::TextDocumentGenerator. It
could be applied to Plucker generator, but I don't have
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155938
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-08-10 22:58 ---
This should be relatively simple to
On Saturday 09 August 2008 07:20:35 pm Dotan Cohen wrote:
I would assume (I cannot check at the moment, sorry) that Okular's .doc
rendering would be based upon KOffice's rendering. If so, as KOffice's
rendering is poor, so then would be Okular's. Open Office has a very
accurate .doc rendering
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155938
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-08-10 01:50 ---
On Saturday 09 August 2008 07:20:35
On Saturday 09 August 2008 11:25:54 am David Short wrote:
I feel that some developers here are getting a little defensive because a
huge amount of work would be necessary to implement all of this, and they
don't want to do it. I'd say that they need to separate the concepts of
what they are
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-08-10 02:30 ---
On Saturday 09 August 2008 11:25:54
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155938
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-08-02 01:33 ---
Roman,
Would you like to give the
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164822
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-06-27 12:30 ---
Thanks Pino
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159007
--- Additional Comments From bradh frogmouth net 2008-03-10 00:13 ---
It may be possible to produce an
89 matches
Mail list logo
