https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417274
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427913
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #27 from Manuel Geißer ---
Sure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #25 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 142205
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=142205&action=edit
(unrelated) okular-mupdf-backend build error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #24 from Manuel Geißer ---
So I installed the dependencies and tried to build okular-mupdf-backend (from
git master), but it fails with some "Variable not declared in this scope"
error. Also there have been no commits to the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #23 from Manuel Geißer ---
I guess you are referring to
https://invent.kde.org/sandsmark/okular-mupdf-backend ? The thing is, there are
multiple unofficial Okular MuPDF generators around...
Moreover, why is this not officially part of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #21 from Manuel Geißer ---
`grep -r mupdf` on the Okular source tree doesn't find anything, either
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #20 from Manuel Geißer ---
> There is also a muPDF backend for Okular. Did you try that?
Is this at all still current? I checked out okular from
https://invent.kde.org/graphics/okular.git and built with CMake, but couldn't
find any
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #19 from Manuel Geißer ---
> There is also a muPDF backend for Okular. Did you try that?
The Ubuntu Focal mupdf package currently fails to open the file
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mupdf/+bug/1943366). This likely is
fixed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #18 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think it might be better if the Okular developers would report to Poppler,
> since I never used the Poppler library interface myself and thus don't have
> the
> required background.
I now
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #17 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think you should report at PDFium, pdf.js, Poppler, and pikepdf.
I think it might be better if the Okular developers would report to Poppler,
since I never used the Poppler library interface myself and t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #16 from Manuel Geißer ---
> I think you should report at PDFium, pdf.js, Poppler, and pikepdf.
Be careful - there are considerable differences between these libraries. I
don't really know about pdf.js and PDFium, but pikepdf is q
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #15 from Manuel Geißer ---
>From the referenced code we can see that Okular uses the
Poppler::Page::pageSizeF() function to obtain the page size:
https://poppler.freedesktop.org/api/qt5/classPoppler_1_1Page.h
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #13 from Manuel Geißer ---
Another possibly relevant code passage:
https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/3a513f34b8bbba87bd96718dc96089e079578d55/generators/poppler/generator_pdf.cpp#L1303
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #12 from Manuel Geißer ---
I've searched a bit in the code, and at least the rendering proportions issue
is Okular's fault I think:
https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/3a513f34b8bbba87bd96718dc96089e079578d55/generato
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #11 from Manuel Geißer ---
Pdfinfo from poppler-utils does not show regular units like centimetres or
inches, but it keeps the PDF points. Pdfinfo is a low-level tool that does not
perform unit conversion on its own. However, it does not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|aa...@kde.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #9 from Manuel Geißer ---
Sorry. I just thought you'd be the maintainer of Okular, and wondered why you
are not in the CC list, but apparently this has its reason. Sorry, really.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|aa...@kde.org |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #7 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141456
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141456&action=edit
adobe_reader
... only Adobe Reader gets the proportions right
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #6 from Manuel Geißer ---
List of other affected PDF software:
* Chromium integrated PDF viewer (uses PDFium)
* Firefox integrated PDF viewer (uses pdf.js)
* Inkscape PDF importer (uses Poppler)
* Scribus PDF importer
* PDFStitcher (uses
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Okular does not take|Okular does not take
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141455
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141455&action=edit
Proportions pdf
For you to confirm the UserUnit is set on the first page of the document in the
screenshot, but not
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #4 from Manuel Geißer ---
> the space reserved for rendering the actual page
or better formulated: the proportions of different pages to each other
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #3 from Manuel Geißer ---
To clarify, I think it is not only the displayed size number that is incorrect,
but also the space reserved for rendering the actual page:
The screenshot I just added illustrates it better: The first page is from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Geißer ---
Created attachment 141454
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=141454&action=edit
userunit_screenshot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Python shell code to reproduce (replace TestFiles.userunit_10 with the path
string where you saved the file, and skip the first import which depends on
custom test infrastructure of the lib I am developing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Geißer ---
Ping. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
Bug ID: 442280
Summary: Okular does not take /UserUnit into account (page size
incorrect)
Product: okular
Version: 21.08.1
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
St
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Neon Packages
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Manuel Geißer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||geisse...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441676
Bug ID: 441676
Summary: Resizing the left panel is jerky
Product: okular
Version: 21.08.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
P
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411241
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #0)
> EXPECTED RESULT
Double-click on icon will open the note.
Right-click on icon will open the same menu as in the "Reviews" list.
> SOFTWARE
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411241
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Created attachment 122320
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=122320&action=edit
PDf file exported from libreoffice
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411241
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Created attachment 122319
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=122319&action=edit
open pop-up menu in "Reviews" list
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411241
Bug ID: 411241
Summary: strange interface to notes created by LibreOffice
Product: okular
Version: 1.3.3
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Sev
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383651
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373133
Manuel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuelbailenhernandez@gmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372618
Bug ID: 372618
Summary: Drawing Tool Configuration is not present in the
dialog "options for presentation mode"
Product: okular
Version: 0.26.1
Platform: RedHat RPMs
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368402
Bug ID: 368402
Summary: Okular doesn't support interactive PDF 1.5 link
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252596
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Gus Gustafson from comment #3)
> --Also, what will the experience be if there are very many places needing
> "typewriter"-type function on a page or document, if using inline com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354894
Bug ID: 354894
Summary: allow any graphic/symbol as stamp annotation
Product: okular
Version: 0.20.3
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wish
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348404
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
For what is worth, the solution here http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/94587
fixed the problem: Removing /home/$USER/.cups/lpoptions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348404
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
No problem, it would be a waste of effort to fix something in Qt4 that is fixed
in Qt5. One more reason for updating to Okular 5. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348404
Bug ID: 348404
Summary: in print dialog, default printer should be selected by
default
Product: okular
Version: 0.19.3
Platform: Kubuntu Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341066
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Rüger ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #2)
> Why?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Policies#Execute-Permission%20Bit%20Required
I see there was already a discussion in 2009:
http://marc.info/?l=kde-c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341066
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Rüger ---
Sorry, switched arguments on diff.
diff --git a/active/app/active-documentviewer.desktop
b/active/app/active-documentviewer.desktop
old mode 100755
new mode 100644
diff --git a/generators/chm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341066
Bug ID: 341066
Summary: Drop executable bits from .desktop files
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: min
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185636
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190308
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Related to: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208736
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing list
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190308
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308160
--- Comment #6 from Manuel ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Can you describe in a clear step by step way what you did from opening
> okular to the crash?
Opening the file from Firefox.
Click on File->Print->[Selected printer]->Print.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308160
--- Comment #4 from Manuel ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does doing just a print preview crash?
No.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Okular-devel mailing l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308160
--- Comment #2 from Manuel ---
Created attachment 74452
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=74452&action=edit
Source of the crash.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308160
Bug ID: 308160
Severity: crash
Version: 0.14.3
Priority: NOR
Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
Summary: Okular crashed on printig postscript file
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
OK. I upgraded Okular and the output is exactly as you said! Great! Thanks very
much.
BTW, the R FAQ is fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Right, that makes sense, but still:
$ kwriteconfig --file okularpartrc --group 'Dlg Performance' --key
GraphicsAntialias Disabled
does not seem to have any effect on the test.pdf. It gives exactl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
I followed the instructions given by the R project itself:
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why-are-there-unwanted-borders
Okular (Linux/KDE)
There is not an option in the GUI to enable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Created attachment 71359
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=71359&action=edit
PDF testcase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Created attachment 71358
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=71358&action=edit
screenshort: left Adobe Reader, right Okular, both with antialising disabled.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300604
Bug ID: 300604
Severity: normal
Version: unspecified
Priority: NOR
Assignee: okular-devel@kde.org
Summary: Rendering artifacts even after antialiasing disabled
Classification: Unclassifi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287138
Manuel Tortosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manutortosa@chakra-project
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #81 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2011-05-07
13:15:11 ---
Fair enough. However, I stand by what I said then: I think this does harm KDE's
reputation.
Anyway, I understand you so I'll leave it here. I hope working on Okula
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #79 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2011-05-07
12:40:52 ---
No, please... It's bug 157284 all over again.
Out of curiosity, is there any other reason not to fix this bug apart from
"punishing bad users" (and thu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242617
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lopeziba...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263778
Summary: File path in "Properties" has %20 instead of blank
spaces
Product: okular
Version: 0.5.81
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #105 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-11-01
00:55:07 ---
I'm very sorry. I decided to publish my comment here because I was under the
impression that the limit was set as a result of this particular issue (due to
comments
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #103 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-10-31
21:20:18 ---
Albert, now that this issue have been happily resolved wouldn't it make sense
to restore the limit of votes per bug to 20?
In my opinion, a newcomer would have a hard
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #98 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-10-30
00:37:36 ---
Thank you. I'd say much more than 53 users will be grateful.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #90 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-10-29
22:44:41 ---
In fact, there are no "kids" to educate. You are dealing with lots of Okular
users, most if which aren't even aware that this discussion exists.
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #89 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-10-29
22:30:32 ---
Albert, do you really think misbehaving users still care about this feature?
They probably carried on with their lives and went to troll elsewhere. Why
weren't they b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #82 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-10-28
11:27:10 ---
After reading Albert Astals Cid's latest blog post about Qt merge request
process
(http://tsdgeos.blogspot.com/2010/10/qt-gitorious-merge-requests-and-open.html)
I just
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251978
Summary: Print->Properties...->Advanced is not wide enough
Product: okular
Version: 0.10.2
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amre...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
--- Comment #7 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-09-09
22:33:46 ---
poppler bug reported: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30107.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
--- Comment #5 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-09-09
21:31:45 ---
Ok, thanks!
I have a question though. As far as I know, Evince also uses poppler as its
backend. Shouldn't this bug also manifest in that program? Printing the "
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
--- Comment #3 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-09-09
16:55:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=51481)
--> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51481)
Minimal cover triggering the bug (if the Symbian logo is removed the bug
doesn'
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
--- Comment #2 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-09-09
16:54:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=51480)
--> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51480)
Cover without the problematic logo (doesn't trigger the bug)
--
Configure bugmai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
--- Comment #1 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-09-09
16:53:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=51479)
--> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51479)
Full cover saved as PostScript (doesn't trigger the bug)
--
Configure bugmai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250674
Summary: Okular prints text and vector graphics thicker than
they should under some circumstances
Product: okular
Version: 0.11.1
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250057
Summary: GPL Ghostscript 8.71: Set UseCIEColor for
UseDeviceIndependentColor to work properly.
Product: okular
Version: 0.10.2
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
--- Comment #53 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez 2010-01-09
17:45:22 ---
Yes, I agree with you, Maciej. I think the best solution is the checkbox. What
I'm trying to offer is an alternative in case the checkbox is unacceptable (I
still thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157284
Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amre...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159408
Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amre...@gmail.com
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180521
Manuel Stahl thymythos web de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thymyt...@web.de
--- Comment
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172661
Summary: View mode shortcut does not work
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Ubuntu Packages
OS/Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: wishlist
Prio
90 matches
Mail list logo
