[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Christoph Feck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||scroogemcd...@web.de --- Comment #30 from

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In||18.12.0 CC|

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Tobias Deiminger changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/oku

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #28 from Dileep Sankhla --- I'm working on this feature request as a GSoC 2018 student and you can find my project here: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#6053164340477952 and my proposal here:

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Simon Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simonandr...@gmail.com

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #27 from Tobias Deiminger --- > Seems like an interesting idea to explore, just remember that you're going > to need more layers of abstraction since okular core doesn't know anything > about poppler Yes, and I have to

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Albert Astals Cid changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aa...@kde.org --- Comment

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #25 from Tobias Deiminger --- > TypeWriter and Inline note need a better WYSIWIG than a popup widget Full ack. But that's not all, imho. The attachment 111769 and attachment 111770 make clear what I'm afraid of could

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #24 from Tobias Deiminger --- Created attachment 111770 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111770=edit Qt vs. poppler - TextAreaEdit Real world example where Qt-rendered TextAreaEdit generates different visual

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #23 from Tobias Deiminger --- Created attachment 111769 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111769=edit QT vs. poppler - RadioButtonEdit form field Real world example where Qt-rendered radio button overlays

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #22 from Simone Gaiarin --- I cannot comment about the technicalities of poppler, but I agree that both TypeWriter and Inline note need a better WYSIWIG than a popup widget. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #21 from Tobias Deiminger --- > typewriter tool is to write text without any background anywhere (e.g to fill > forms) > inline notes are to add post-its like notes in the document (with a > background) Yeah, nice sum

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #20 from Simone Gaiarin --- I don't think that bug 358061 is a duplicate. In my opinion the typewriter tool is to write text without any background anywhere in the file (e.g to fill forms), while inline notes are a

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Tobias Deiminger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haxti...@posteo.de ---

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Dileep Sankhla changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #17 from sombrag...@sombragris.org --- Please keep this in mind and consider implementing it as soon as possible. Thanks!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 sombrag...@sombragris.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sombrag...@sombragris.org ---

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 ANKIT YADAV changed: What|Removed |Added CC||any65...@gmail.com -- You

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Simone Gaiarin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simg...@gmail.com -- You

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #15 from Simone Gaiarin --- *** Bug 358062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #14 from noric --- This is where I asked Poppler's devs: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93213 Yesterday I reported your findings to them. Let's see if they can help. -- You are receiving this mail

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #11 from Sumit Sahrawat --- I looked through the poppler source once again. I realized that even though the freeText annotation is implemented internally, the poppler-qt4 package doesn't export it.

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #9 from noric --- I asked Poppler's devs and they say FreeText is already implemented in Poppler. They say the actual typewriter tool needs to be implemented by Okular (and other readers relying on Poppler). -- You

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #8 from Sumit Sahrawat --- Seems like I underestimated the issues. 2-3 cannot be implemented without poppler support, sadly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #6 from Sumit Sahrawat --- I forgot to mention it here, the review request I made has been merged. 1) There are still some improvements to be made, but the code that was merged works perfectly when it

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Gus Gustafson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||efelthau...@gmail.com

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 Sumit Sahrawat changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 353401] Feature requst: "typewriter" annotation tool

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353401 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Gus Gustafson from comment #3) > --Also, what will the experience be if there are very many places needing > "typewriter"-type function on a page or document, if using