https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
--- Comment #5 from br_shadow ---
Thank you so much.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||1.11.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/kde/
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
--- Comment #3 from Nate Graham ---
Thanks, that makes sense. I wonder if a real split view feature would be an
ultimately more appropriate solution though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
--- Comment #2 from David Hurka ---
There are use cases, which are partially based on the lack of split view (Bug
169847)
Imagine any long datasheet, where page 27 references some table cells on page
125. Or an instruction set summary, where branch con
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419096
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
Status|REPORTED