Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Updating r151006 to r151014

2015-05-19 Thread Jim Klimov
20 мая 2015 г. 6:54:02 CEST, Tim Rice пишет: >On Tue, 19 May 2015, Dan McDonald wrote: > >| >| > On May 19, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Tim Rice wrote: >| > >| > >| > Since one of the VMs is the storage server on my all-in-one box it >| > had smartmontools loaded. I had to remove smartmontools for the >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Updating r151006 to r151014

2015-05-19 Thread Tim Rice
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Dan McDonald wrote: | | > On May 19, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Tim Rice wrote: | > | > | > Since one of the VMs is the storage server on my all-in-one box it | > had smartmontools loaded. I had to remove smartmontools for the | > update to work and there is no smartmontools for r1

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Updating r151006 to r151014

2015-05-19 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 19, 2015, at 7:02 PM, Tim Rice wrote: > > > Since one of the VMs is the storage server on my all-in-one box it > had smartmontools loaded. I had to remove smartmontools for the > update to work and there is no smartmontools for r151014. :-( Which publisher provides smartmontools? If

[OmniOS-discuss] Updating r151006 to r151014

2015-05-19 Thread Tim Rice
Last weekend I updated my r151006 VMs to r151014. One with a zone. The notes at http://omnios.omniti.com/wiki.php/Upgrade_to_r151014 were quite good. One piece not mentioned (although obvious when you think about it) was that for those of us that froze at r151006, it is necessary to unfreeze to u

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] New OmniOS bloody update

2015-05-19 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 6, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > Based on omnios-build commit 69a5016 and illumos-omnios commit 385735e. Shoot. The packages aren't out yet and I hit Send early. Please wait about 30-60 minutes before upgrading. Otherwise you'll only see the small changes outside illum

[OmniOS-discuss] New OmniOS bloody update

2015-05-19 Thread Dan McDonald
Based on omnios-build commit 155193f and illumos-omnios commit c4ba593. This is a partial update, but includes the entirety of illumos-omnios, so expect a reboot. Remember, if you're doing full-repo transfers, use the new "-m latest" argument in pkgrecv to prevent pulling old packages over. Si

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Samba Performance

2015-05-19 Thread Doug Hughes
Oops, when I was comparing numbers I didn't take the left column into account. I didn't realize it was enumerated by protocol, and being in 'screen', I didn't see it correctly in scrollback. mea culpa. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On May 19, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Doug

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Samba Performance

2015-05-19 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 19, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Doug Hughes wrote: > > > ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 1048576 > ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 1048576 > ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_max_buf 4194304 Umm... not as much now. The ipadm(1M) Michael showed is the moral equivalent, and better supported. Dan ___

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Samba Performance

2015-05-19 Thread Doug Hughes
The equivalent TCP raw tunings for Solaris based OS's ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_xmit_hiwat 1048576 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_recv_hiwat 1048576 ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_max_buf 4194304 Those are the raw tunables and if you run get on those you'll see that they are different than what's in ipadm. One is just

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Samba Performance

2015-05-19 Thread Dan McDonald
> On May 19, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Michael Talbott wrote: > > And then in Omni, I've set these ip properties > root@store3:# ipadm show-prop > PROTO PROPERTY PERM CURRENT PERSISTENT DEFAULT > POSSIBLE > tcp max_buf rw 16777216 16777216 1048576

[OmniOS-discuss] Samba Performance

2015-05-19 Thread Michael Talbott
Hi all. I've been transitioning a file server to OmniOS for many reasons (abandoning zfsonlinux). But I seem to have one last issue I'd like to resolve. It seems to be running into a performance issue with samba. I'm not using the built in zfs smb sharing because I need more flexibility in our e

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Query - Update gcc48 to gccXX, which XX?

2015-05-19 Thread John D Groenveld
In message <201505190123.t4j1n4qc029...@elvis.arl.psu.edu>, John D Groenveld writes: >Does anyone have a build recipe for LLVM/clang on OmniOS? LLVM depends on CMake and Python-2.7.9. Both build easily with stock gcc-4.8.1. John groenv...@acm.org ___ O

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Poor performance on writes Zraid

2015-05-19 Thread Dain Bentley
And no dedup On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, Jim Klimov wrote: > 18 мая 2015 г. 23:18:15 CEST, Dain Bentley > пишет: > >Hello all, I have a RaidZ setup with 5 disks and rad performance is > >good. > >I have no ZIL pool and 8 GB or ECC Ram. Writes are like 2 MB a second > >with > >a 1GB network. I'

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Poor performance on writes Zraid

2015-05-19 Thread Dain Bentley
Thanks for the help guys. Integrated CIFS. Reads are fast. The pool is about 60% full only. Thanks for the tips! I'll try iostat to sniff this out On Tuesday, May 19, 2015, Jim Klimov wrote: > 18 мая 2015 г. 23:18:15 CEST, Dain Bentley > пишет: > >Hello all, I have a RaidZ setup with 5 di

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] disk failure causing reboot?

2015-05-19 Thread Rune Tipsmark
Same issue here around two months ago when a L2arc device failed… failmode was default and the device was actually an mSata SSD mounted in a PCI-E mSata card: http://www.addonics.com/products/ad4mspx2.php and the disk was one of four of these http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/memory-storage/MZ