> On Feb 16, 2017, at 7:06 AM, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>
>
> Anyone interested in more information from a kernel panic this morning?
>
> OmniOS v11 r151020
Please share.
Thanks,
Dan
___
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
Anyone interested in more information from a kernel panic this morning?
OmniOS v11 r151020
carolina# (24) uname -a
SunOS carolina 5.11 omnios-bed3013 i86pc i386 i86pc
> ::status
debugging crash dump vmcore.0 (64-bit) from carolina
operating system: 5.11 omnios-bed3013 (i86pc)
image uuid:
I would like to remind all those interested in netatalk that a future switch to
smb will probably cause loss of finder labels and similar metadata, plus some
mismatch in uncommon characters like question marks and so on.
At least, both happened to me and I was using a very basic configuration.
Hi,
This issue is caused indeed by the calls to getcwd that are very slow on
illumos/solaris. A workaround that solves the performance problems is to avoid
those calls entirely by setting “follow symlinks = yes”.
However, this will allow server-side symlinks to be followed outside the
Hi Fabio,
Let me tell you about my personal hell. In 2014 I tried to set up a big file
server for a motion graphics client using netatalk on SmartOS.
To put it succinctly, it was a disaster. The Finder took forever to open
windows on the server, etc.
With help from people who actually know
I recall I've seen this:
http://www.napp-it.com/doc/downloads/performance_smb2.pdf
It would be an interesting document to read (it's not focused specifically
on Netatalk but it explores some performance patterns using Mac OS X
clients with NFS/SMB v1/v2 on OmniOS server side).
On Wed, Feb 15,
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Adam Feigin"
An: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 09:47:50
Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] SMB and Netatalk
On 15/02/17 18:16, omnios-discuss-requ...@lists.omniti.com wrote:
> From: F?bio Rabelo
On 15/02/17 18:16, omnios-discuss-requ...@lists.omniti.com wrote:
> From: F?bio Rabelo
> To: omnios-discuss
> Subject: [OmniOS-discuss] SMB and Netatalk
> Message-ID:
>