Folks,
I have started to create packages for omnios and I am a bit at a
loss as to packaging 'standards' ...
With omnios getting more popular, I think it would be a good move
to have some standards as to where things should go on the system
...
good old
/opt/X
/etc/opt/X
/var/opt/X
come to
Hi Chavdar,
Yesterday Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
Any particular reason not to use the default smb/server under OmniOS? My
Solaris/OmniOS/OpenIndiana hosts all have joined our domain without many
problems:
I am aware of the differences in semantics as far as samba and Solaris
smb/server is
Hi Thomas,
Today Thomas Werschlein wrote:
Hi Tobi
On 16.09.2013, at 22:56, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
I am trying to use samba/winbind to hook up our omnios box to an AD
server. After some fiddleling, I managed to compile samba +
openldap linked to the system krb5 libraries
Just experimented for the first time with zones on my omnios box
... workes fine ... great stuff ... except that I now realize that
zoneadm -z xxx install
by default it seems to install bloody, how do I get a zone installed
with stable ?
cheers
tobi
--
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG,
Today Eric Sproul wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch wrote:
Just experimented for the first time with zones on my omnios box
... workes fine ... great stuff ... except that I now realize that
zoneadm -z xxx install
by default it seems to install
Hi Michael,
Today Michael Mounteney wrote:
Hello, as my current OmniOS server doesn't have removable disks, I've
added an external USB2 HDD as a mirror, so that in the event of fire or
holiday, the external disk can be taken away as a backup.
How does OmniOS deal with a very slow mirror ?
We are in the process of deploying omnios for a large customer with
a complex group setup ... only to find that support for more than
16 groups per user was broken ... this got fixed upstream in the
mean time ...
could you please merge the fix ?
Folks,
We are trying to implement a fileserver using OmniOS. The customer
has been on Linux until now, but ZFS seems VERY tempting.
The first problem we ran into is that OmniOS seems to limit the
number of groups per user to 16 by default. Setting ngroups_max to
128 in /etc/system seemd to take
Today Ira Cooper wrote:
Actually, just set ngroups_max to 1024 in /etc/system, there is an outside
chance of a user having 128 groups in some AD environments. 1024 seems
less likely.
so you suggest that setting ngroups_max to 128 is bad ? while
setting it to 1024 would be good ? in our setup
Today Ira Cooper wrote:
If it works, use it.
I'm merely stating from experience in situations with even more groups, the
max is 1024, and people may wish to be aware of it / use it. I personally
use it just so I don't have to worry about increasing it. But that's me.
in testing it worked,
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
