Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-23 Thread Lauri Tirkkonen
On Fri, Oct 23 2015 09:44:58 +0300, Lauri Tirkkonen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23 2015 01:20:16 +0200, Volker A. Brandt wrote: > > It's been a while since I last tried, but I think this will not work, > > at least not in some corner cases, e.g. when the pkg is not installed > > at all > > I don't know a

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Lauri Tirkkonen
On Fri, Oct 23 2015 01:20:16 +0200, Volker A. Brandt wrote: > Eric Sproul writes: > > The service has restarted correctly for me on both 006 and 014 with > > this update. I'm not sure why that is though, because you're > > correct that the ntp.xml file has not changed in all of the '014 > > versio

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Lauri Tirkkonen
We may be getting a bit off topic here :) On Fri, Oct 23 2015 01:13:59 +0200, Volker A. Brandt wrote: > Lauri Tirkkonen writes: > > Well, that's not a design flaw. Actuators are executed only when the > > action (eg. file) specifying them changes > > Yes, this is how IPS does it. IPS does not re

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Volker A. Brandt
Eric Sproul writes: > The service has restarted correctly for me on both 006 and 014 with > this update. I'm not sure why that is though, because you're > correct that the ntp.xml file has not changed in all of the '014 > versions published. I was under the impression that the > restart_fmri actu

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Volker A. Brandt
Lauri Tirkkonen writes: > > Well, no, it doesn't. :-) That's due to a design flaw in the > > interaction between IPS and SMF (IMHO). [...] > Well, that's not a design flaw. Actuators are executed only when the > action (eg. file) specifying them changes Yes, this is how IPS does it. IPS does no

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Lauri Tirkkonen
On Thu, Oct 22 2015 20:57:45 +0200, Volker A. Brandt wrote: > Thanks for all the work you're doing on OmniOS! > > > > On Oct 22, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Dan McDonald > > > wrote: > > > > > > "pkg update" followed by "svcadm restart ntp" as a safety measure > > > should be sufficient. No rebooting is n

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Eric Sproul
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Volker A. Brandt wrote: >> I made a small mistake here. The "svcadm restart..." is not >> necessary, the IPS package does the right thing here. > > Well, no, it doesn't. :-) That's due to a design flaw in the interaction > between IPS and SMF (IMHO). Even though

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Volker A. Brandt
Hi Dan! Thanks for all the work you're doing on OmniOS! > > On Oct 22, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Dan McDonald > > wrote: > > > > "pkg update" followed by "svcadm restart ntp" as a safety measure > > should be sufficient. No rebooting is needed. > > I made a small mistake here. The "svcadm restart..."

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Dan McDonald
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > "pkg update" followed by "svcadm restart ntp" as a safety measure should be > sufficient. No rebooting is needed. I made a small mistake here. The "svcadm restart..." is not necessary, the IPS package does the right thing here. Sorry f

[OmniOS-discuss] UPDATE NOW --> ntp to 4.2.8p4

2015-10-22 Thread Dan McDonald
The NTP software was updated to 4.2.8p4 yesterday. I've pushed out updates for r151006, r151014, and bloody. As I mentioned earlier, r151012 users should update to r151014. "pkg update" followed by "svcadm restart ntp" as a safety measure should be sufficient. No rebooting is needed. NTP's