Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

: Friday, November 10, 2017 8:48 AM To: Gary Wu <gary.i...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue Gary, This breaks current projects whose release jobs on the master branch are producing Staging art

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

: Friday, November 10, 2017 8:48 AM To: Gary Wu <gary.i...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue Gary, This breaks current projects whose release jobs on the master branch are producing Staging art

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Gary, This breaks current projects whose release jobs on the master branch are producing Staging artifacts. I will now have to remove those jobs. I understand for a formal release process you don’t want staging in the mix. But unfortunately perhaps this could have been done post Amsterdam

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Gary, This breaks current projects whose release jobs on the master branch are producing Staging artifacts. I will now have to remove those jobs. I understand for a formal release process you don’t want staging in the mix. But unfortunately perhaps this could have been done post Amsterdam

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Thanks Jess. All teams: Please make sure that you are no longer building against staging artifacts. If you still have dependencies on staging artifacts, please contact the upstream teams to make sure that they formally release those artifacts. Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From:

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Dear Gary, We have now removed the staging as an active profile from global-settings.xml now and the dependencies should now be downloaded from releases. Thanks! Jess On Mon Nov 06 13:43:31 2017, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote: > Hi Jessica, > > Thanks for the investigation. At this point in

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Hi Jessica, Thanks for the investigation. At this point in the release cycle, I think the better solution now is to just completely remove staging from settings.xml. All teams should be formally releasing their artifacts by now, and we should no longer be having any build dependencies on

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Hi Jessica, Thanks for the investigation. At this point in the release cycle, I think the better solution now is to just completely remove staging from settings.xml. All teams should be formally releasing their artifacts by now, and we should no longer be having any build dependencies on

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Dear Gary, I was briefly talking with Andy about this ticket. I made a test in the sandbox in where I am changing the values that global-settings have as the active profiles. Basically, this file has the releases, staging, snapshot active profiles described in that order. This file controls

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

This issue is still occurring and still needs LF resolution. Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: Kenny Paul via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 7:43 PM To: Gary Wu Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: [ONAP

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

I’m reviewing all of the tickets in the LF IT queue that are open. Is this still an issue that needs support from IT or can this ticket be closed? Thanks! -kenny On Wed Sep 06 17:18:23 2017, gary.i...@huawei.com wrote: > I just noticed the issue today, but I suspect it's been happening for > a

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

I just noticed the issue today, but I suspect it's been happening for a long time. Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 2:10 PM To: Gary Wu Cc:

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

I just noticed the issue today, but I suspect it's been happening for a long time. Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 2:10 PM To: Gary Wu Cc:

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Actually I think the key step is the next one where "clean deploy" is being done, but it doesn't hurt to have them all configured to have Releases be the top priority. Also this should really be done for all Maven jobs including merge and verify, not just release-version. The right long term

Re: [onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Actually I think the key step is the next one where "clean deploy" is being done, but it doesn't hurt to have them all configured to have Releases be the top priority. Also this should really be done for all Maven jobs including merge and verify, not just release-version. The right long term

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Hey Gary, quick question.. did you saw this happening the time we released oparent 0.1.0? Thanks! Jess ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [ONAP Helpdesk #45447] [integration] Maven repo precedence issue

Sure Gary, It seems that this should be a property of this step: versions:set versions:update-child-modules versions:commit -B Let me investigate how to do that in this case and get back to you Thanks! Jess ___ onap-discuss mailing list