Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-09-06 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Good news, thank you Christina. Quick follow up to verify that you are talking about R1 ONAP, right? Is that something that AT&T can do? Thank you! Gil _ From: MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 8:24 AM To: BULLARD, GIL ; Kang X

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-09-06 Thread MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA
Hi Gil, I don't see any issue with adding MAC address to p-interfaces. We could also add a query to help simplify this parent lookup: P-interface (by mac-address) to pnf. Thank you, Christina Monteleone Professional-Tech Requirements Mgmt Flex Force 732.420.3639 ___

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-09-05 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Team, I have made the changes described below and uploaded the deck to the vCPE use case "drafts for discussion" page: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Residential+Broadband+vCPE+Drafts+for+discussion?focusedCommentId=15992837&refresh=1504629237289#comment-15992837 Please comment. Thanks, Gil ___

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-09-01 Thread Yoav Kluger
Gil, such a well written, detailed summary, produced by a half brain - while the other half is already on vacation - should be studied :) Two clarifications to provide context - do not read if you have understood all of Gil's email and do not need clarification. 1. The general idea is: the

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-09-01 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Team, I talked with Yoav who had some good suggestions on how to minimize the departure from "reality" with the introduction of the Allotted Resource model for a BRG and solve the A&AI problem I mentioned before. I won't get a chance to update my slides before I leave for vacation, but here are

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-08-31 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Team, I made some updates that result in the BRG Allotted Resource Resource-Level flow looking like the TunnelXConn Allotte Resource Resource-Level flow, which is appropriate and necessary in fact. I also updated the BRG_EMU Service-Level flow to clarify that now Robot must remember the BRG_EMU

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-08-31 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Hey Yoav, Kang, I think we need a meeting with A&AI and SDNC to work out the details, given the open issue with not knowing which component will be creating in A&AI certain cloud resources which may be needed to carry the MAC Address in the event. Note that now it will be a VNF and not a PNF th

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-08-30 Thread Yoav Kluger
Gil, Are you saying that what is still missing are the exact format of the object in A&AI and the exact format of the event produced by A&AI when this object is updated? Or do you see something more than that which we still need to work out? Thanks, Yoav Kluger Amdocs Technology +1(201)912-7294

Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-08-30 Thread BULLARD, GIL
Team, I have updated the slides based upon the feedback today that modeling of BRG as a PNF will not be viable from an SO perspective in R1. I have thus changed it to an Allotted Resource. The updated slides can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Residential+Broadband+vCPE+Drafts+f

[onap-discuss] [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion

2017-08-30 Thread Kang Xi
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02000