Not sure why it the mail below did not reflect on the onap-discuss mailing list.
Re-posting here.
Regards
Aayush
On 9 September 2017 at 09:04:14 IST, Aayush Bhatnagar
wrote:
There is one architectural doubt on Policy Enforcement, which is explained
below -
When
Hi Lisa,
Would you help clarify the expected “sequence of events”?
That would help the PTLs be better prepared for M4, which is due in 2 weeks.
Thanks,
Lingli
From: Lisa Caywood [mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: 2017年9月12日 3:38
To: Dhananjay Pavgi
Lingli, Dhananjay, let's huddle and resynch. I think there's some confusion
on the sequence of events here.
Thanks, Lisa
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Dhananjay Pavgi <
dp00476...@techmahindra.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Lingli for prompt response, appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Very valid and the most
Dear ONAP TSC members,
Marc Volovic of Amdocs is stepping down as a committer on the External API
project (please see email below).
I would like to recognize and thank Marc for his contributions to our project.
Mark Gibson of Amdocs expressed interest in replacing Marc as a committer, and
we
Thanks, Lingli for prompt response, appreciate it.
Very valid and the most important point considering R1 timelines. Will have to
chart out working plan for R1 with PTLs.
Given paucity of time for R1; suggest we cover following topics at the minimum:
1. Architecture Enhancements from R1
Hi Dhanajay,
Thanks for the well-prepared proposal.
I have a quick question:
As the document states, that the subcommittee and current proposals are not
bounded to R1, I am wondering what is the working plan for R1.
So far as I know, LF has contacted with PTLs preparing for similar material