Re: [onap-tsc] Discussion on Policy hysteresis.

2017-09-11 Thread Aayush.Bhatnagar
Not sure why it the mail below did not reflect on the onap-discuss mailing list. Re-posting here. Regards Aayush On 9 September 2017 at 09:04:14 IST, Aayush Bhatnagar wrote: There is one architectural doubt on Policy Enforcement, which is explained below - When

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP University subcommittee : proposed charter.

2017-09-11 Thread Lingli Deng
Hi Lisa, Would you help clarify the expected “sequence of events”? That would help the PTLs be better prepared for M4, which is due in 2 weeks. Thanks, Lingli From: Lisa Caywood [mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: 2017年9月12日 3:38 To: Dhananjay Pavgi

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP University subcommittee : proposed charter.

2017-09-11 Thread Lisa Caywood
Lingli, Dhananjay, let's huddle and resynch. I think there's some confusion on the sequence of events here. Thanks, Lisa On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Dhananjay Pavgi < dp00476...@techmahindra.com> wrote: > Thanks, Lingli for prompt response, appreciate it. > > > > Very valid and the most

[onap-tsc] FW: Committer on external API project

2017-09-11 Thread MAYER, ANDREW J
Dear ONAP TSC members, Marc Volovic of Amdocs is stepping down as a committer on the External API project (please see email below). I would like to recognize and thank Marc for his contributions to our project. Mark Gibson of Amdocs expressed interest in replacing Marc as a committer, and we

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP University subcommittee : proposed charter.

2017-09-11 Thread Dhananjay Pavgi
Thanks, Lingli for prompt response, appreciate it. Very valid and the most important point considering R1 timelines. Will have to chart out working plan for R1 with PTLs. Given paucity of time for R1; suggest we cover following topics at the minimum: 1. Architecture Enhancements from R1

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP University subcommittee : proposed charter.

2017-09-11 Thread Lingli Deng
Hi Dhanajay, Thanks for the well-prepared proposal. I have a quick question: As the document states, that the subcommittee and current proposals are not bounded to R1, I am wondering what is the working plan for R1. So far as I know, LF has contacted with PTLs preparing for similar material