Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-tsc-vote] ONAP University Subcommittee - Voting Ends Monday Sep. 18, 5PM Pacific Time

Thank you. This request has been approved by the TSC. Please see the onap-tsc-vote archives for more information and the history of this vote. https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc-vote/ Regards, Jen Wood Operations Analyst The Linux Foundation jw...@linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Sep 14, 2017

Re: [onap-tsc] [tsc]Vote: ONAP Deployment Proposal for Amsterdam Release

Helen, While I don’t want to jeopardize the Amsterdam release by not voting for the Heat option, I am still concerned about the usability of the deployment. I have some colleagues who tried to deploy openECOMP with the Heat templates and just gave up due to complexity. As you can imagine, they

[onap-tsc] IMPORTANT - Heat and OOM

Dear TSC Community, I need your help to increase the chance of us successfully delivering the Amsterdam release by Nov 16th. The lack of a decision regarding Heat and OOM has increased the risk of getting Amsterdam released on time. I want to clarify the following points. 1. Supporting both

[onap-tsc] Paris Agenda

I have published the agenda for the Paris Developers Meeting. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Developer+Event+September+25-28%2C+2017%2C+Paris-Saclay%2C+France A couple items of note: The m

Re: [onap-tsc] [tsc]Vote: ONAP Deployment Proposal for Amsterdam Release

Hi, Ranny, Very good suggestion. I would like to follow up with you to see how we could improve it and creating a solid plan. Right now, frankly speaking, I am focusing on getting one working solution, therefore I could test the ONAP platform itself instead of testing deployment tool. Will you