Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Thanks, Pam, All requiremenys authors, in case your requirements assume some control loop requirements, please present them, as Pam suggests, during that meeting next week. Best regards, Alla Original Message Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee me

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Yes Alla I have plans to, if folks are available next week. Pam From: Alla Goldner Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 2:23 PM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" , "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org" Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meetin

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Hi Pam, Will you have a meeting next week? Best regards, Alla Original Message Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today From: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" Date: Dec 14, 2017, 14:18 To: Alla Goldner ,onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org Alla and Use

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-usecasesub] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Alla and Use Case Owners, Would it possible to consolidate some parts of this by having Use Case Owners present Control Loop requirements (If Applicable) in the Control Loop Sub Committee meetings? The committee would like to collect and manage all the requirements for Beijing for all the PTL’

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

+1 to the proposal. I’m happy to volunteer. BR, Steve From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gadiyar, Rajesh Sent: 14 December 2017 16:28 To: Phil Robb ; Frank Brockners (fbrockne) Cc: onap-tsc Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TS

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

Hello Nagaraja: Thank you for volunteering to help with the workgroup but I need to limit that participation to the current TSC members. The Charter states that the election process for populating the TSC in steady state will be created by the existing TSC members. That said, I'm sure that the T

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

I agree on clear use of Terminology. That is why I said in my presentation that in the MEF Core Model, we define a MEFNetworkFunction to differentiate it from an ETSI NFV network function. That being said, let's look at the definition of Network Function from ETSI GS NFV 003 v1.2.1: *Network F

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

All, My 2 cents. It really is becoming imperative to agree on ONAP terminology. During today's CIM WS presentation from John Strassner, it became obvious that how we define the ONAP information model is dependent on terminology. We can have 10 different IMs and all of them may be right in the cont

[onap-tsc] SDO slides in ONAP Forum this week

Hello all Please check the enclosed slide for SDOs, thanks a lot for your checking https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/External+SDO+session+in+ONAP+Forum+Dec.+12th%2C+2017 Really thanks MEF/TMF/ETSI NFV/OASIS TOSCA/IETF/ONF for kind help Thursday workshop slide will be posted on Thursday program pa

[onap-tsc] [modeling] ONAP modeling workshop program

Hello all There is a small change to let Kevin present first about IM then let SDO to discuss it later. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+Workshop+Program Thanks a lot DENG Hui ___ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lis

[onap-tsc] [modeling]Zoom ID for ONAP modeling workshop

Hello all Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/349619781 Or iPhone one-tap : US: +16699006833,,349619781# or +16465588656,,349619781# Or Te

Re: [onap-tsc] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Dan, The list you are referring to currently contains many requirements which are not proceeding further, were deprioritized in Paris, or moved as enhancements of specific projects for Beijing and appear under specif project scope proposal for Beijing. Please refer to the new list only as candi

Re: [onap-tsc] Outcomes of Usecase subcommittee meeting today

Alla, Just to clarify, there’s also this larger list on the wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Merged+list+of+R2+functional+requirement+candidates I was assuming (maybe wrongly?) that the 12 requirements presented in that spreadsheet are sort of higher level requirements that summarize thos

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

Hi Phil I would also like to participate in the proposed WG. Thanks ~nagu. From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gadiyar, Rajesh Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 8:58 PM To: Phil Robb ; Frank Brockners (fbrockne) Cc: onap-tsc Subject: R

Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections

+1 I agree with the proposal as well – best to keep the current structure until Beijing Release (May-18). Also, I am happy to participate in the proposed WG to discuss/recommend the new TSC structure. Regards, Rajesh From: on behalf of Phil Robb Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 5:52 PM