Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] Self-Release Process Issues

All For those new to global-jjb, you can tell if your repo has the problem Kenny describes below by looking in the console log of your staging job for the string “autorelease”. You should only find that string AFTER the maven build succeeds. If you see it in the body of the build, you’re still

[onap-tsc] Self-Release Process Issues

All, Self-release is something the community has been asking the LF for since 2017. That is now possible however the process is unfairly getting a bad reputation. Some growing pains are to be expected with any transition, but there has been a rush to judgement that the process is somehow fun

Re: [onap-tsc] Attn PTLs: Review El Alto early drop status

Jim I attached a copy with the updates for CCSDK (CDS) and SDNC. Not all the images are available yet (waiting on CCSDK docker images to be released, and then I can build the SDNC images), but I did already submit changes to OOM to reflect what the image versions will be – which is what’s in t

Re: [onap-tsc] Attn PTLs: Review El Alto early drop status

Hello Jim, Pending the oom approval and merge of the review https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/oom/+/92972/ , the "master" column for the policy components would look like the following.   The columns with versions that you provided seem correct. policy onap/policy-pe 1.4.1 1.5-SNAPSHOT-latest 1.5.

[onap-tsc] ONAP PORTAL project officially requests Test Coverage Waiver

Hello Jim and ONAP TSC, I would like to request a waiver from the TSC in El Alto release for Portal’s test coverage. Facts: * After enabling Javascript (JS) coverage, the portal's coverage dropped from 72.9% to 21.6% - sonar link