Re: [onap-discuss] TR : [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

Hi Kenny, On 29.03.2021 19:17, Kenny Paul wrote: > The most important thing we all need to remember is that everyone is working > very hard to ultimately achieve the same goal. > > In an opensource world changes are most often influenced from the bottom up > rather than instituted from the top

[onap-tsc] LFN Webinar Tomorrow: "NFV Deployments and the Path Ahead: An Operator Perspective"

LFN Community: This is a reminder that we'll be hosting the following LFNWebinar tomorrow, Tuesday, March 30th, 8:00 AM PT. Register here. NFV Deployments and the Path Ahead: An Operator Perspective Beth Cohen, Verizon; Lei Huang, China Mobile; and Randy Levensalor, CableLabs With the drive to dep

Re: [onap-discuss] TR : [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

The most important thing we all need to remember is that everyone is working very hard to ultimately achieve the same goal. In an opensource world changes are most often influenced from the bottom up rather than instituted from the top down. How long a process change takes is going to vary gre

Re: [onap-discuss] TR : [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

Hi Xu Ran, On 29.03.2021 03:40, Xu Ran wrote: > Dear Opasiak and Catherine, > > I have noticed that the block thing of UUI’s merge into OOM is: > > https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/118930 >

Re: [onap-discuss] TR : [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

Good morning Xu, Thank you so much for your feedback. I believe that’s the right thing to do. I will also help to stabilize the release. Let’s focus on https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/119844