[onap-tsc][onap-arc] ONAP Architecture Review Request : MSB London Release

2022-12-06 Thread jinquanni
Dear All, In London release, there are no changes in the architecture of MSB, The non-architecture changes mainly include upgrading the CONSUL version, PACKAGES UPGRADES, and gateway parameter optimization. but I still need the arch sub-committee to decide that although my personal asse

[onap-tsc][onap-arc] ONAP Architecture Review Request : MSB London Release

2022-12-06 Thread jinquanni
Dear All, In London release, there are no changes in the architecture of MSB, The non-architecture changes mainly include upgrading the CONSUL version, PACKAGES UPGRADES, and gateway parameter optimization. but I still need the arch sub-committee to decide that although my personal asse

[onap-tsc] ONAP TSC conditionally approves Sign Off of the Kohn release #kohn

2022-12-06 Thread David McBride
Team, Per the TSC plan from last week, we reviewed the status of Kohn release Sign Off at yesterday's PTL meeting. We had a quorum of TSC members, and the TSC voted to conditionally approve Sign Off. You may find the details in the PTL meeting minutes . Congratula

Re: [onap-tsc] Request for Telekom portal as PoC within ONAP

2022-12-06 Thread Byung-Woo Jun
Hi David, This would be a good topic for discussion at TSC this week. Thanks. BR, Byung From: David McBride Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 10:35 AM To: Byung-Woo Jun Cc: Paweł Pawlak , Rajewski Łukasz , Fiedler, Marc , Geissler, Andreas , Riehl, Andre , Schweflinghaus, Georg , onap-...

Re: [onap-tsc] Request for Telekom portal as PoC within ONAP

2022-12-06 Thread David McBride
It seems like we're mixing up two different processes: new project vs new requirement. So, I think that the first thing to agree on is whether we're talking about a new project or a new requirement. Recall that the original Portal project was a "project" not a requirement. However, if it is a "

Re: [onap-tsc] Request for Telekom portal as PoC within ONAP

2022-12-06 Thread Byung-Woo Jun
Hi, Here is my two cents… To my understanding, Georg and DT proposed the Portal NG as a PoC project in London. He presented the Portal NG PoC architecture to ARCCOM and he got no objection. David McBride would know better, but in my opinion, the PoC can be handled informally, still creating P

Re: [onap-tsc] Request for Telekom portal as PoC within ONAP

2022-12-06 Thread Lukasz Rajewski
Dear Pawel, David, I am sorry but I do not understand the process that Georg has to follow to move the thing forward. Do we have to create formal REQ to initiate a new project? New Portal. I don't see that standard REQ submissions process is a case in this situation. Is there procedure for new

Re: [onap-tsc] Request for Telekom portal as PoC within ONAP

2022-12-06 Thread Pawel Pawlak via lists.onap.org
Hi Łukasz, The process I found on the Wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+Proposal+Process+Overview I see that Georg prepared the proposal inline with this process: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/PortalNG+Project+Proposal So I guess it is high time to book a slot for TSC meeting and p