Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] Weekly ONAP Release Status - Sept 29, 2021 #weeklyupdate

regarding the honolulu gate you should only consider the runs performed during the week end. - https://logs.onap.org/onap-integration/daily/onap_daily_pod4_honolulu/2021-09/25_22-17/ - https://logs.onap.org/onap-integration/daily/onap_daily_pod4_honolulu/2021-09/26_14-49/ The results are corre

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Committer changes

Hi TSC several changes to be mentioned regarding the committers in Integration. We have now 2 new committers: - Bartosz Gardziejewski (Nokia): 11 votes Yes on 11 (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Commiter+Promotion+Request+for+Bartosz+Gardziejewski ) - Alexander Mazuruk (Samsung): 7 votes Yes on

Re: [onap-tsc] Integration PTL elections : Call for Self-Nominations

case, I assume it is difficult to apply the same rule for Integration. Regards Morgan De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org [morgan.richomme=orange@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2021

[onap-tsc] Integration PTL elections : Call for Self-Nominations

Dear Integration committers, With my resignation, a PTL election for Integration project will be held by the process described hereafter: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Annual+Community+Elections+-+Process#AnnualCommunityElectionsProcess-PTLElections Call for nominations for the role of Integ

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Stepping down as Integration PTL

Dear ONAP community and Integration team, As announced in Guilin, Honolulu was the last release for me as Integration PTL. I will still contribute to ONAP integration but Integration PTL requires a 100% commitment, which is no more possible due to changes of assignment within my company. As sev

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Honolulu] [Integration] rationales for sign-off decision

Hi some rationales from Integration team regarding last tests on honolulu for TSC: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/93002422/honolulu_sign-off.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1619699810197&api=v2 See you for the TSC meeting. Regards Morgan

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] docker releasing process

Hi as indicated during several PTL meeting, I would like to release some testing dockers according to the different versions we are dealing with (https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21710). Today all these dockers are snapshot dockers Our automated tests are embe

Re: [onap-tsc] [OOM] Post mortem of passing Honolulu RC0 and consequences

good summary I am in line with the observation and support the proposals to improve the reliability/trustability from an integration perspective, I also missed something when our daily Master clearly showed regression beginning of the year. I should have raised the flag quicker but it is hard to

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] integration committer promotion Illia Halych

Dear TSC, I would like to request review/approval for Illia Halych committer promotion for Integration project. All committers voted in favor (11 yes/0 no on 13 committers) see https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Committer+Promotion+Request+for+Integration+Illia+Halych for details Eli worked on

TR : [onap-tsc] [IMPORTANT] OOM status update for RC0

*TL; DR:* xtesting dockers (tests) and xtesting-onap (test launchers) should have been frozen before RC0..so next time we have to think to that.. Integration shall guarantee a stable testing baseline to OOM to gate confortably.. Full Text --- As indicated by Sylvain, the te

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP and Community Lab Requirements

Hi are you OK with the timing (just after Honolulu ..in April..we never released the date we planned but never months after either :) ) ? Morgan De : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN Envoyé : vendredi 12 mars 2021 19:36 À : Kadera, Michael J; Monkman, Bob; Mishra, Sharad

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Honolulu] [Use cases] [Integration] questions on the needs for the use cases

Hi I had a look at the use case list for Honolulu: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Honolulu+Release+Requirements I did not see lots of documentation patches or questions regarding needed resources for the tests of these use cases, could you confirm that I did not miss anyhting from an integrat

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP and Community Lab Requirements

Hi I shared the info with the community during the last PTL meeting A consensus would be to plan the operation just after the release H Sign Off is planned on the 8th of April so end of April sounds OK /Morgan De : Kadera, Michael J [michael.j.kad...@intel.com] E

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Honolulu] Backup & restore and other resiliency tests

Hi Catherine during the Integration weekly meeting we got a discussion on the definition of a test around Backup&restore for Honolulu. Minutes can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Meeting+Minutes And slide deck can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attach

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] |Intel/Windriver lab] HW operations to be planned

Hi I had a meeting with Intel team regarding the upgrade of the community lab (aka Intel/Windriver lab). Hardware and security upgrades are needed. In fact some of the servers are very old (> 5years - which explains some performance issues we already reported) and security waivers have been reg

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Honolulu] comparison of docker versions Gulin:Master (Honolulu candidate)

Hi please find hereafter a link to compare the docker versions in guilin and in master (honolulu candidate) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1t3GNRtabdkVxG4ZAxqBJ-X7OO-Zv6xRwd8KrR52V9zU/edit?usp=sharing blue = no change green = change orange = does not exist anymore as you can see there ar

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin maintenance release] integration status

Hi, we did not evoke the topic for some weeks and next week will be very busy with the DDF. As you can see the Daily CI/CD chain guilin looks stable (thanks to DT to share their daily lab results: http://testresults.opnfv.org/onap-integration/results/index-onap-guilin-daily-hp-ONAPatDT-oom.html

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Orange DC] Upgrade of Orange DC

Hi, we are about to upgrade our OpenStack solution hosting the following labs: - orange-daily-frankfurt - orange-daily-guilin - orange-weekly-guilin - orange-daily-master - orange-weekly-master - orange-gating_orange1 - orange-gating_orange2 - orange-gating_orange3 - orange-gating_orange4 - orange

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Licenses] Image scanning

Hi Alexander run a new Docker image scanning campaign on a recent ONAP master deployment (14st of January). Long time ago I made some tests and shared first results of Tern with PTL. Alexander went further by testing 163 images, almost all the images declared in the ONAP cluster. Moreover thanks

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] [testsuite/cds] Repository committer cleanup

Hi for information, I prepared the update of the INFO.yaml related to the testsuite/cds repository. I removed inactive committers - 2 committers no more active in Guilin - 1 committer no more working on ONAP (he left his company) I added a new committer. He replaced the person who left and is th

Re: [Onap-release] [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] [Integration] stability test first results

...@lists.onap.org] de la part de Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org [morgan.richomme=orange@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : mardi 8 décembre 2020 09:50 À : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-rele...@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org Objet : Re: [Onap-release] [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] [Integration] stability

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] [Integration] stability test first results

: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] [Integration] stability test first results Thanks Morgan. Is there any insight about SDNC limit issue? Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 7:26 PM To: onap-rele

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] [Integration] stability test first results

Hi I planned to work on an official documentation page for the stability testing tomorrow. I just want to share some results (I already shared some during last PTL meeting) We run 2 stability tests in addition of the daily Guilin. 1) Daily Guilin src: https://logs.onap.org/ona

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] [ONAP] [Guilin] list of use cases for Guilin

recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! 发件人: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] 代表 Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org 发送时间: 2020年11月19日 0:32 收件人: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org 抄送: onap-rele

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Dockerhub Update

Thanks Kenny As discussed in rocket chat yesterday, could you declare the dockerhub user "onapintegration" as the 5th seat. This user will be used for ONAP integration daily/weekly CI chains Thanks Morgan De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] d

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] CD chains and CSIT tests strongly impacted by dockerhub policy change

Hi, recently Docker has enabled download rate limits for pull requests on Docker Hub. Several upstream components used in ONAP are hosted in dockerhub. As a consequences lots of CD chains or CSIT tests are now failing due to the error: "Error response from daemon: toomanyrequests: You have reac

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Guilin] list of use cases for Guilin

Hi, during the Integration weekly meeting today we had a discussions on the use cases for Guilin. In fact we changed the way we were tracking the progress (move from wiki table to JIRA) and I probably missed something but I fear I am missing some use cases. Where can I find the exhaustive list

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] committer promotion for Lasse Kaihlavirta

Dear TSC, I’d like to promote the Lasse Kaihlavirta as Integration project committer: Lasse is involved in Integration for a long time. He is now working on the CSIT improvement and recently detailed his roadmap during the last PTL meeting. See https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Committer+Promoti

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] testing docker images no more available in Nexus

. > LF IT will first focus on Gerrit migration issue then will > investigate your concerns about Nexus > > Best regards > Catherine > > -Original Message- > From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of > Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org > Sent: Tuesday

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] testing docker images no more available in Nexus

Hi, since last night the xtesting master dockers used for the different master CI chains are no more available on the Nexus. Concretely it means that all the tests executed on the Master CI chains (daily/weekly/gating) cannot be executed anymore. A ticket has been raised ( https://jira.linuxfoun

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] committers refactoring

Hi TSC, Kindly request to review & approve following committer promotions. New committers/extensions * Lukasz Rajewski: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Committer+Promotion+Request+for+Integration+Lukasz+Rajewski * Michal Jagiello: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=846

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] new repository requests

ok my bad I was pretty sure I put onap-tsc in copy, I used to do it..but apparently I forget it here thanks for the feedback I will start the self-release process Morgan Le mardi 18 août 2020 à 17:08 +, Lefevre, Catherine a écrit : Good afternoon Morgan, All, First of all there is no more

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] new repository requests

Hi Jess I am fine with the process (already used it succesfully), I just wait for an approval from infra-coordinator before starting. Morgan Le lundi 17 août 2020 à 09:06 -0700, Jessica Wagantall a écrit : Hi Morgan, Do you have the TSC approval for these repos? Do you need help with the proc

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] new repository requests

Hi, I did not get any feedback on the repo creation request? - testsuite/cds - integration/terraform - integration/simulators/5G-core-nf-simulator Any update? as said I am OK to use the self-service process, but I assume I need a green light first, and as fas as I know, I did not get any so far.

Re: [onap-tsc] [Onap-release] [Maintenance Release]Status Update

Hi El Alto regarding the 2 items - 1309: this test deals with the onboarding/distribution/instantiation of a simple Ubuntu VM through ONAP in the logs, we can see that the SDC onboarding part seems OK, distribution is initiated, SO and AAI got the distribution but not the SDNC If we look at mor

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Maintenance Releases] What's onboarded from an OOM point of view

+ for Frankfurt maintenance release testsuite: 1.6.3 -> 1.6.4 (robot pod) (*** NOT YET MERGED ***: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/testsuite/oom/+/109949) - Change owning-entity-id from hard coded to variable: TEST-234 - Some corrections for vLB CDS: TEST-247

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] [Maintenance release] status on certificates

Hi I know that we are approaching the Frankfurt maintenance release. I was wondering what is planned regarding the certificates. I shared the certificate view from the nodeport perspective some weeks ago. Yesterday we detected that an internal certificate also expired (aaf-cert-service) so I gav

Re: [onap-tsc] Guilin Release: REQ-335 to REQ-338

Hi I will hopefully have a better view tomorrow :) I remember I saw a presentation in Prag on this topic. @Lei do not hesitate to correct me if I am wrong. The title of the requirements is maybe a bit misleading, Certification shall be indicated. As far as I remember automation testing here d

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] first results from daily Frankfurt CI with ONAP RC2

SB-00 installation is now completed the post installation status can be found in https://logs.onap.org/onap-integration/windriver-SB00/2020-06-12/ OOF is up&running Versions are correct (see Windriver SB-00 12/06/2020 column): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1t3GNRtabdkVxG4ZAxqBJ-X7OO-Zv6

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] first results from daily Frankfurt CI with ONAP RC2

Hi for information, the first daily frankfurt CI including all the RC2 dockers has been executed last night On Orange lab. The results are good: https://gating-results.onap.eu/results/onap_daily_pod4_frankfurt-592266326-06-12-2020_02-06/ There is 1 single error in healthcheck tests: Health-Chec

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Integration] new repository for integration team testsuite/robot-utils

Hi I would like to ask for the creation of a new repository testsuite/robot-utils. This repository will host the code of a wrapper to offer onap-pythonsdk functions to robot test developers. It will be a small repo include python, robot and configuration files. I updated the page https://wiki.on

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Use case regression tests on RC2

sorry I forgot to precise, IP changes from one deployment to another jumphost IP: 10.12.5.66 Cluster IP: 10.12.6.10 /Morgan De : xin.m...@fujitsu.com [xin.m...@fujitsu.com] Envoyé : mardi 9 juin 2020 18:24 À : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN; David McBride; FREEMAN, BRIA

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Use case regression tests on RC2

oops the lab SB-00 (I mention 2 labs in the mail) the right one is SB-00 Morgan De : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN Envoyé : mardi 9 juin 2020 14:47 À : David McBride; FREEMAN, BRIAN D; PLATANIA, MARCO; Bartlomiej Grzybowski; haibin.hu...@intel.com; zhaolip...@chinamobil

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Use case regression tests on RC2

Hi RC2 environment has been re-installed in Windriver/Intel lab SB-00 using OOM/frankfurt. As use case owner, please verify your use case and report the status in the RC2 column of https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2%3A+Frankfurt+Release+Integration+Testing+Status Please note that due to the c

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] we have never been so closed..

Hi short update after the TSC meeting 1) all the RC2 dockers have been delivered, the Target RC2 column is almost fully green :) (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1t3GNRtabdkVxG4ZAxqBJ-X7OO-Zv6xRwd8KrR52V9zU/edit#gid=1893816488) the non green cells are due to the fact that the dockers ha

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for RC2

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for RC2 Morgan, I see that my change to Frankfurt was merged last night (thanks, OOM team!). Dan From: on behalf of "Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org" Reply-To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" Date: Tuesday, Jun

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for RC2

Dan From: on behalf of "Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org" Reply-To: "onap-...@lists.onap.org" , "morgan.richo...@orange.com" Date: Monday, June 1, 2020 at 6:29 AM To: David McBride , "LEFEVRE, CATHERINE" , "onap-...@lists.onap.org" Cc: &q

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for RC2

there is no more changes and bug fixed. BR, Yan 发件人: onap-...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org] 代表 Morgan Richomme via lists.onap.org 发送时间: 2020年6月1日 18:30 收件人: David McBride; Lefevre, Catherine; onap-...@lists.onap.org 抄送: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Krzysztof Opasiak; ZWARICO, AMY

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for RC2

Hi I will not be able to attend this afternoon (Public holiday in Europe). I updated the status for the PTL meeting 1) Do we have all our RC2 dockers? * the Readiness board is up to date: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Frankfurt+Readiness+dashboard RC2 dock

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP][Integration][use cases] last update for the use case release doc

my last statement was not correct I got confirmation from Yuriy for CDS automation and doc for 5G PNF Pre-Onboarding & Onboarding is in progress (patch in review) De : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN Envoyé : mardi 26 mai 2020 16:42 À : onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc@l

[onap-tsc] TR : [ONAP][Integration][use cases] last update for the use case release doc

FYI Mail on the use case doc did not get any feedback so far De : RICHOMME Morgan TGI/OLN Envoyé : jeudi 21 mai 2020 12:23 À : SEAUDI Abd El Muhaimen O-EG/HRCS; ym9...@att.com; prabhuba...@gmail.com; andre.sch...@est.tech; Przybysz, Marcin (Nokia - PL/Wroclaw);

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] [oparent] committer promotion

Hi, I would like to add Pamela Dragosh to the list of committers for oparent. She is the main contributor of this project, used by all the java projects to manage their dependencies. A patch is ready (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oparent/+/106285), wait for coordinator/TSC approval before merge. R

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] new repository for integration team testsuite/pythonsdk-tests

Hi, I would like to ask for the creation of a new repository testsuite/pythonsdk-tests related to smoke tests leveraging onap_pythonsdk framework. I updated the page https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories. The tests will take over the previous smoke tests done with the fram

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Frankfurt RC1 delayed one DAY to May 8 #frankfurt

Hi the RC1 verify table has been updated by the PTL https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Frankfurt+Readiness+dashboard thanks update on my previous mail RC1 could be possible from an Integration perspective if - we got the confirmation from AAF, PORTAL, OPFRA, MUSIC, MULTICLOUD that they do not pl

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Frankfurt] [RC1] Integration status

Hi please find hereafter the integration status for RC1 decision. Master daily (OOM frankfurt branch not available yet, still working on Master) https://gating-results.onap.eu/results/onap_daily_pod4_master-542000762-05-07-2020_07-05/ 1) M4 issues security category 50 % (66% expected) 1.1 http e

[onap-tsc] [ONAP [integration] Committer Promotion Request for Krzysztof Kuzmicki

Hi I would like to promote Krzysztof Kuzmicki as Integration committer. He is very active in different use cases especially on 5G He has already a long experience of ONAP. He integrates pnf_registrate in the CI chain (still work in progress) He is in the top 10 of the integration contributor over

[onap-tsc] [ONAP [integration] Committer Promotion Request for Andreas Geissler

Hi I would like to promote Andreas Geissler as Integration committer. He is a:lready bery busy as TSC member. he is also already committer in doc project. He is sharing DT lab results in the common DB results since El Alto He is troubleshooting lots of E2E tests (NBI, CDS related) and is contribut

[onap-tsc] [ONAP [integration] Committer Promotion Request for Pawel Wieczorek

Hi I would like to promote Pawel Wieczorek as Integration committer. He created at least 80% of the security tests included in CI Over the last 6 months he is ranked #3 in term of contribution in Bitergia/Integration He helped Portal to fix security issues in Frankfurt and has a strong open sou

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Frankfurt] Integration status for TSC meeting

Hi summary of integration view for the TSC meeting (I will be off tomorrow) Daily Master results * All the daily master run results can be seen on https://gating-results.onap.eu/results/ results of the day: https://gating-results.onap.eu/results/onap_daily_pod4_master-51139

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [ONAP] Daily master (pre-Frankfurt) CI follow-up

value at the top (38%) an aggregate of the values below (infra HC, HC, smoke, security)? David On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:04 AM Morgan Richomme via Lists.Onap.Org<http://Lists.Onap.Org> mailto:orange@lists.onap.org>> wrote: Hi as discussed yesterday during the PTL meeting

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] Daily master (pre-Frankfurt) CI follow-up

Hi as discussed yesterday during the PTL meeting, please find hereafter some links to track the daily master test results (pre-Frankfurt). I already started exchanging with the PTLs to confirm that the versions are the correct ones based on the "Verify Readiness dashboard". I%20started%20with%

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] Daily master (pre-Frankfurt) CI follow-up

Hi as discussed yesterday during the PTL meeting, please find hereafter some links to track the daily master test results (pre-Frankfurt). I already started exchanging with the PTLs to confirm that the versions are the correct ones based on the "Verify Readiness dashboard". https://wiki.onap.or

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] new repository for the pnf-simulator

Hi, I would like to ask for the creation of a new repository related to the pnf simulator (integration/simulators/pnf-simulator). I updated the page https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories. This simulator has been introduced in previous version it is currently hosted in the i

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] new repositories for mdons use case

Hi, I would like to ask for the creation of 2 repositories related to the MDONS use case planned in Frankfurt (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories). Could we create: * integration/usecases/mdons * integration/simulators/dc-simulator These small 2 repositories wi

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Nexus 3 upgrade happening soon

Note a JIRA has been created on Integration https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-1493 I reassigned to Jessica + Bengt in cc (LF IT in Australia Time Zone) De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] de la part de Adrian Osullivan [adrian.osulli...@huawei

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] request for a new repository

Many thanks & regards Catherine -Original Message- From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Morgan Richomme via Lists.Onap.Org<http://lists.onap.org/> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 2:18 PM To: infrast

Re: [onap-tsc] Please join the ONAP PTL meeting NOW!

Hi, I already mentioned it in ONAP and OPNFV, the time MUST be in UTC - U means Universal, it is a reference to avoid confusion, it does not change whatever the timezone - in the agenda the meeting is at 2PM UTC, so it starts in 30 minutes... everybody usually knows the time change of his/her t

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] request for a new repository

+ David Le mardi 03 mars 2020 à 14:17 +0100, Morgan Richomme a écrit : > Hi > > I completed the wiki page > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories > > The request deals with the creation of a repository for the bbs use > case. > integration/usecases/bbs > as mentioned in th

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] request for a new repository

Hi I completed the wiki page https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories The request deals with the creation of a repository for the bbs use case. integration/usecases/bbs as mentioned in the wiki page, for the moment we put all the code/config/doc of the use cases in centralized

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [CI][Integration] security tests integration in ONAP CI chains

Hi I am happy to announce that a new xtesting security docker has been integrated end of last week. This new docker includes 3 new tests dealing with security: - root_pods: we check that the pods are not run as root - unlimitted_pods: we check that limits have been set for each pod - cis_kuberne

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Request for 3 new repositories to manage baseline docker images

gt; still unreconciled issues, the Infrastructure Coordinator will > escalate the request to the TSC for review and approval. > " > > Thanks, > Xinhui > > On 12/19/19, 11:30 PM, "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org on behalf of Morgan > Richomme via Lists.Onap.Org" m

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Request for 3 new repositories to manage baseline docker images

Hi I did not get any feedback on this request (see below). sent on the 21st of November For the next PTL meeting, some projects asked for a status on the availability of such images. But without repo, we cannot start building dockers. With the xmas break, it will be hard to finalize this before 20

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] Integration Committer Removal

Dear TSC, I am writing to inform you that Mariusz Wagner ( mariusz.wag...@nokia.com) officialy notified that he was stepping down from his integration committer position. He will be removed from Integration committers list. Regards, Morgan, Integration PTL _

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] Consul in El Alto and beyond

Hi last week we reinstalled the Orange Openlab with the El Alto version. We automatically generate a README for the end users listing all the useful endpoints/credentials for the different components. In this README we are still referencing Consul endpoints http://msb.api.discovery.simpledemo.ona

[onap-tsc] Integration Committer promotion requests : Eric Multanen & Bartek Grzybowski

Dear TSC, I’d like to notify some updates regarding the list of committers of the integration project 1) Gary Wu notified by mail that he will no more be involved in ONAP. He was still referenced as a committer thanks to his high activity over the last past 9 months. He was one of the ONAP pio

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [Integration] Request for 3 new repositories to manage baseline docker images

Hi XinHui I open a new ticket for the creation of 3 new repositories aiming to host Dockerfiles to build refeence docker images to be used as baseline images (Alpine 11 + Java11 and Alpine11 + Python3) by the other ONAP projects. - integration/docker/onap-baseline - integration/docker/onap-java11

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Integration] request for a new subrepository

Hi, the request https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-18078 is still pending. I created a new one in order to get a repository to host the code of a RAN simulator. https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-18206 @lin, I was not able to find yo

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] [CSIT] csit jjb cleaning planned 3rd of December

Hi, as discussed during PTL meeting today, a cleaning operation of the CSIT disabled jobs is planned beginning of December. During El Alto, some tests had been disabled but kept in the CSIT page. They correspond to grey ball jobs in the jenkins page: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/CSIT/ The goal

Re: [onap-tsc] Milestone Exception Process for ONAP #release

Hi, is there any rationales from OPNFV on this exception process? What were the consequences of having introduced such exception process in OPNFV projects? Did it help, fix or hide problems? How beneficial was it for the OPNFV community? I added Bin and Tapio (current and former OPNFV TSC chair)

[onap-tsc] Integration committer removal

Hi TSC, I would like to notify that I have updated the INFO.yaml of the repositories - integration (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/integration/+/97688) - integration/csit (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/integration/csit/+/97687) - testsuite (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/testsuite/+/97759) - testsuite-hea

[onap-tsc] [ONAP][Integration] request for a new subrepository

Hi as Integration PTL, I would like to create a new integration sub- repository integration/xtesting ( https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-18078 - I was not able to share the ticket with you). Jessica indicated me the procedure. I need your green light before getting

[onap-tsc] [ONAP] committer revokation rules

Hi, I sent a mail some weeks ago to clean the INFO.yaml of the integration project in order to reflect more the reality of the project through this file. I asked people referenced as integration committer who are not active since at least 9 months or more (see stats done for the Integration PTL