Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-30 Thread Catherine LEFEVRE
Good morning Sylvain, I do not recommend that we raise a ticket when we find a criteria is not met. This methodology is a factor of scope creep like we have observed during the Frankfurt release. I strongly recommend that each requirement is originally tracked per project as a jira ticket or wi

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Vijay VK
+1, separate REQ JIRA will help tracking. Sylvain, The logging changes will also need some discussion. In earlier release, logging project put out very detailed standards for log file formats and mandated four separate log files. For consolidation of logs, filebeat mechanism was suggeste

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Pamela Dragosh
+1 Dan - these should all be captured as Guilin Release Requirements REQ JIRA's. Just like what was done in Frankfurt. Pam On 4/29/20, 10:08 AM, "onap-...@lists.onap.org on behalf of TIMONEY, DAN" wrote: *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***. Reference ht

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread TIMONEY, DAN
All, Capturing these all on a wiki page would be helpful. However, my concern is that, when the time comes for us to commit to M1 for Guilin, we PTLs need to have a definitive list of what we're being asked to commit to so that there are no missed expectations. I was thinking that items like

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak via lists.onap.org
I knew that if I say anything in this thread it will mean I'll have to do some extra work xD but OK, I may start putting sth together but after a while I think that actually a page in read the docs like documentation team has (doc developer guide) would be more suitable. Any thoughts? On 29.

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org
Well, yes it's a good idea! As part of it comes from SECCOM, I propose someone who has the two hats to initiate the writing, a.k.a you :-P De : Krzysztof Opasiak [k.opas...@samsung.com] Envoyé : mercredi 29 avril 2020 15:37 À : DESBUREAUX Sylvain TGI/OLN; T

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak via lists.onap.org
Hi, On 29.04.2020 15:11, sylvain.desbure...@orange.com wrote: Hey Dan, Nope I didn't create any stories. What I can do (if possible) is to create one story per requirement (I count roughly 15) and create a sub task per project (if possible in project board). That would add 15 tasks per proje

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-29 Thread Sylvain Desbureaux via lists.onap.org
Hey Dan, Nope I didn't create any stories. What I can do (if possible) is to create one story per requirement (I count roughly 15) and create a sub task per project (if possible in project board). That would add 15 tasks per project (knowing that some will be irrelevant for the project, like "c

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-ptl] [OOM] Guilin Release Plan

2020-04-27 Thread TIMONEY, DAN
Sylvain, Thank you for the excellent summary, which was also explained quite well at last week’s virtual face to face event. One process question, though: are there already user stories created for these items (perhaps SECCOM user stories)? I want to make sure we’re tracking these requirement