Hi,
catched this by accident ...
Am 21.02.2012 20:03, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
>>
>> So this is more an administrational problem than a technical one. We
>> may have to do it the manual way, as you have described, at first.
> It's not possible to do the work only over the web frontend. I can't
Hi,
Am 19.12.2011 13:38, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Dwayne Bailey
> wrote:
>> Small teams, small number of people wanting to make sure that OOo in
>> whatever form is localised. The strings are almost 100% the same, at the
>> moment, between AOO and LibO. So how to
ntrol, then we probably don't have it. But it looks like we
>> have the actual translations.
> In this case it could be a good idea to contact André Schnabel
> (andre.schna...@gmx.net) from LibreOffice because since the old OOo days
> he is highly committed to these things and I
Hi Rob,
Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local
infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't
believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP righ
Hi,
Am 19.10.2011 18:52, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Considering the prominence being given to Team OpenOffice.org in some of these
conversations:
It appears (according to that font of knowledge, Wikipedia) that an e.V in
Germany is somehow comparable to an LLC or LLP in the US and elsewhere.
Hi,
Am 19.10.2011 15:21, schrieb FR web forum:
I have no idea how much money arrives via the OOo donate button, but
then I'm not the one making statements full of such gross assumptions
about the balance and use of ASF funds.
Older CC has published it:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/C
Hi,
first of all, I feel sorry, that I did forward the request to this list.
Seems you feel more disturbed than than realizing the chance to help
someone with his thesis.
Regarding questions about Oracle:
I already asked Fabian if it was not better to ask about Apache, not
Oracle. He then
Hi Florian,
Am 28.07.2011 23:41, schrieb Florian Effenberger:
Hello,
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on 2011-07-28 22:04:
I support Malte's recommendation to add two individuals that are
currently in-common with respect to OpenOffice.org (traditional) and
LibreOffice.
I must confess I find it rea
Hi Rob,
Am 28.07.2011 04:08, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Now that we've confirmed that the ooo-security list exists and the three
moderators appear to be subscribers, I believe the next action is to subscribe
the existing OO.o/LibreOffice secu
Hi,
Am 13.07.2011 00:37, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is
something
that can wait though.
You might think different, when you was an actual user or autho
Hi,
Am 11.07.2011 18:39, schrieb Rob Weir:
From a branding perspective you did have the opportunity to start
fresh, but you did not go with a ".org" name.
It did not matter that we had the opportunity to start fresh - what
really did matter was that we *had to* start fresh.
Anyway - every
Hi Rob,
Am 04.07.2011 03:03, schrieb Rob Weir:
Any chance of TDF requiring Apache 2.0 for new code contributions, in
addition to their current requirement for LGPL/MPL?
You asked this already, and afair I did answer on that.
Although formally the SC can decide on this, I (with my hat as SC
12 matches
Mail list logo