Re: [Discuss] Guidance regarding acceptable interaction on mailing lists

2012-06-12 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > Sorry for top posting...meant to post this to ooo-dev, not ooo-private. > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, David McKay wrote: >> >>> As I mentioned back at the start of A

Re: [Discuss] Guidance regarding acceptable interaction on mailing lists

2012-06-12 Thread Donald Harbison
Sorry for top posting...meant to post this to ooo-dev, not ooo-private. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Donald Harbison wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, David McKay wrote: > >> As I mentioned back at the start of April, I think that we could do with >> something that outlines the t

Re: [Discuss] Guidance regarding acceptable interaction on mailing lists

2012-06-12 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David McKay wrote: > > On 11/06/12 23:31, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> Good idea.   But this discussion belongs on ooo-dev.  There is no need >> for it to be private. >> >> -Rob > > Yes, you're right. Moved to ooo-dev. > Thanks, Dave. What I wanted to point out is that

Re: [Discuss] Guidance regarding acceptable interaction on mailing lists

2012-06-12 Thread David McKay
On 11/06/12 23:31, Rob Weir wrote: Good idea. But this discussion belongs on ooo-dev. There is no need for it to be private. -Rob Yes, you're right. Moved to ooo-dev. Dave. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, David McKay wrote: As I mentioned back at the start of April, I think that we cou