On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi license experts, all,
>> >>
>> >> I
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo)
> wrote:
> >> Hi license experts, all,
> >>
> >> I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Hi license experts, all,
>>
>> I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
>> header.
>>
>
> If you look at our project webpages (those at
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Hi license experts, all,
>
> I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
> header.
>
If you look at our project webpages (those at
incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg) you see that they do all have the
ALv2 stated
Hi license experts, all,
I'm just wondering if it's necessary to label our webpages with the ALv2
header.
At least for our JavaScript files I could think of that it is suitable
as it is kind of code? Or also for CSS files? All webpage files?
Would be great to get opinions from our license g