Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; People that like to check the commit logs may have noticed a stream of patches tagged: "iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario" Well, I am glad to announce the core of the OS/2 port is now committed in the tree. There are still some small patches that Yuri will by sending in soon, but in esse

Re: Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 11/11/2011 07:36 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni: People that like to check the commit logs may have noticed a stream of patches tagged: "iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario" yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-) Well, I am glad to announce the core of the OS/2 port is now committed in the t

Re: Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Yuri Dario
> yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-) it is :-) > Great, I keep my fingers crossed that a 3.4 build will work fine. current status: builds :-) I still don't know if it runs, but I see some problems in registry handling (component registration is now different from 3.2). Also I'm unable to

Re: Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
--- On Fri, 11/11/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote: ... > > "iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario" > > yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-) > FWIW, in the process I found we were doing pretty stupid things like patching the redland license to choose LGPL over AL2. > > Do you have any numbers or reali

Re: Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Jerry Kemp
I have no delusions that OS/2 is a major player, but it is still out there as an active product and being developed for. FWIW, OS/2 is now ecomstation. http://www.ecomstation.com/ A new, major release was just recently completed, and I have no doubt that current OS2/Ecomstation users appreciate

Re: Announce: OS/2 Port mostly in the tree!

2011-11-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Ah yes: http://www.ecomstation.com/product_info.phtml?url=nls/en/content/openoffice.html cheers, Pedro. --- On Fri, 11/11/11, Jerry Kemp wrote: > I have no delusions that OS/2 is a > major player, but it is still out > there as an active product and being developed for.  > FWIW, OS/2 is now ec