Hi Andrew / Ross,
Lets try to get to the bottom of this.
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 09:42 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> If anyone on this list believes a *specific* CWS is valuable as the
> project as it moves forwards then here is what to do...
>
> Go to our repository and look to see if it i
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Andrew / Ross,
>
> Lets try to get to the bottom of this.
>
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 09:42 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> If anyone on this list believes a *specific* CWS is valuable as the
>> project as it moves forwards then here is
On 4 May 2012 12:07, Michael Meeks wrote:
> The replies so far seem to suggest that it is normal and acceptable for
> code available from the tip of an active branch, from the Apache project
> svn with an AL2 header on it, to not be under AL2. Is that correct ?
Whilst in the Incubator and
