On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 04:12:09 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Personally Peter I would *love* to see the
ASF adopt mirrorbrain somehow, and encourage
you to work with Henk on something along those
lines. We know it's good, we just have a lot
of legacy infra that we need to keep supporting.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Peter Poeml:
anyone, including ASF infra, is free to use MirrorBrain. My
recommendation is that ASF infra upgrades from closer.cgi to MirrorBrain,
because then they can integrate the existing OOo/AOo mirrors into
Hi,
Am 13.04.2012 um 01:59 schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Pöml pe...@poeml.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the
Peter Poeml:
anyone, including ASF infra, is free to use MirrorBrain. My
recommendation is that ASF infra upgrades from closer.cgi to MirrorBrain,
because then they can integrate the existing OOo/AOo mirrors into Apache
mirroring easily.
I would also like that we take advantage of MirrorBrain
Am 04/16/2012 01:09 AM, schrieb Peter Pöml:
Hi Joe,
Am 13.04.2012 um 20:47 schrieb Joe Schaefer:
Not what I need atm drew. I'm looking
for the names/addresses of people associated
with this PPMC who manage the network-
ie the local analog of Henk. Peter is
one guy, are there any others?
No
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 23:15 +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Peter Pöml wrote:
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the
[ooo-dev only]
Masterful reply - now that, IMHO, is how to disagree politely. I
learned something today. Thanks also for trying to accurately reflect
the different views expressed here.
Ross
On 15 April 2012 19:28, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 23:15 +0200, Eberhard
...@poeml.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior solution?
Hi Joe,
Am 13.04.2012 um 20:47 schrieb Joe Schaefer:
Not what I need atm drew. I'm looking
for the names/addresses of people associated
with this PPMC who
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Peter Pöml pe...@poeml.de wrote:
Hi Joe,
Am 13.04.2012 um 20:47 schrieb Joe Schaefer:
Not what I need atm drew. I'm looking
for the names/addresses of people associated
with this PPMC who manage the network-
ie the local analog of Henk. Peter is
one guy,
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Peter Pöml wrote:
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the upcoming AOO
download serving test.
I can hardly believe reading this!
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:39 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Drew;
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500,
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Peter;
it's really amazing to
Right. The plan all along was to migrate the mirrorbrain network to apache
mirrors and supplement that with sf help. That we all agreed to this only to
have sand kicked in our faces again is merely status quo for how this project
operates.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:00 AM,
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 03:23 -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Right. The plan all along was to migrate the mirrorbrain network to apache
mirrors and supplement that with sf help. That we all agreed to this only to
have sand kicked in our faces again is merely status quo for how this project
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior solution?
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 03:23 -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Right. The plan all along was to migrate the mirrorbrain network to apache
mirrors and supplement
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 23:00 -0700, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:39 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Drew;
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500,
: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior solution?
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 03:23 -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Right. The plan all along was to migrate the mirrorbrain network to
apache mirrors and supplement that with sf help. That we all agreed
On 13 April 2012 14:00, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 05:38 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Bit late to pretend you're trying to be helpful
here with the bits about NIH you like tossing around.
What questions are you asking again? And what facts
are you pointing out?
you'll have to excuse me while I figure out where
else all this unwanted sand could've come from.
From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system
who worked out this
deal you'll have to excuse me while I figure out where
else all this unwanted sand could've come from.
From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror
this
deal you'll have to excuse me while I figure out where
else all this unwanted sand could've come from.
From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system
our mirror system for an inferior solution?
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 03:23 -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Right. The plan all along was to migrate the mirrorbrain network to
apache mirrors and supplement that with sf help. That we all agreed to
this only to have sand kicked in our faces again
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 14:42 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 13 April 2012 14:00, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 05:38 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Bit late to pretend you're trying to be helpful
here with the bits about NIH you like tossing around.
What questions are
On 13 April 2012 17:58, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 14:42 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
...
Alright, so it is just a matter of existing policy
At this point I think I ought to let infra team members answer as they
are both infra people and thus able to answer your
all this unwanted sand could've come from.
From: drew d...@baseanswers.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior solution?
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 03:23 -0400
to not incur needless costs, something
I consider eminently fair and reasonable.
HTH
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior
joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: Ditching our mirror system for an inferior solution?
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 11:11 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
FTR, I just got thru discussing these issues with
Henk
Hi,
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the upcoming AOO
download serving test.
I can hardly believe reading this! What's going on? We have an existing (and
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Pöml pe...@poeml.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN services) to support the upcoming AOO
download serving test.
I can
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Pöml pe...@poeml.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the last ten days to line-up dedicated
infrastructure (including CDN
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 18:49 -0700, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Pöml pe...@poeml.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 03.04.2012 um 18:17 schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
We at SourceForge have worked the
Peter;
it's really amazing to see level of support and general service that
mirrorbrain has provided historically for OpenOffice. We haven't
said no to mirrorbrain but you do understand that we just couldn't
turn down the extra support offered by sourceforge. Everyone that
offers to help is
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Peter;
it's really amazing to see level of support and general service that
mirrorbrain has provided historically for OpenOffice. We haven't
said no to mirrorbrain but you do understand that we just couldn't
turn down the extra support
Hi Drew;
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500,
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Peter;
it's really amazing to see level of support and general
service that mirrorbrain has provided historically for
OpenOffice.
We haven't said no to
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:39 -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Drew;
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 21:09 -0500,
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Peter;
it's really amazing to see level of support and general
service that mirrorbrain has provided
--- Gio 12/4/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
...
Because we just have no basis for rejecting mirrors.
Sure we do, groups; particularly non-profits turn down
offers from commercial operators all the time. Lets be
clear the SF offer is not all about contributing to
the project
35 matches
Mail list logo
