gt;To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:59 AM
>Subject: Re: Feedback Requested: Proposed SourceForce Mirror of AOO 3.4
>
>On 26 March 2012 17:22, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Mark Ramm wrote:
>>
>>> >> - SourceFor
On 26 March 2012 17:22, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Mark Ramm wrote:
>
>> >> - SourceForge.net would be the “recommended default download” on the
>> website.
>> >
>> > What would that look like? On what page do we make this branch? In
>> > most of our communications we
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Mark Ramm wrote:
> >> - SourceForge.net would be the “recommended default download” on the
> website.
> >
> > What would that look like? On what page do we make this branch? In
> > most of our communications we will point the public to this URL:
> >
> > http:
>> - SourceForge.net would be the “recommended default download” on the
>> website.
>
> What would that look like? On what page do we make this branch? In
> most of our communications we will point the public to this URL:
>
> http://download.openoffice.org
>
> (That then redirects to http://w
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm resending our proposal as per previous thread 'Sourceforge and
> AOO 3.4 distribution' asking for a feedback.
>
> As Mark Ramm wrote before we could commit to delivering the full
> download volume, we wanted to produce a
Hi all,
I'm resending our proposal as per previous thread 'Sourceforge and
AOO 3.4 distribution' asking for a feedback.
As Mark Ramm wrote before we could commit to delivering the full
download volume, we wanted to produce a vetted plan, including a clear
timeline and backing technical implement
