On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 05/10/11 21:07, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
>
> Hi Mathias,
>
> >
> > Of course that would probably mean that our Linux version won't run out
> > of the box on most Linux machines as the old OOo version did. It will
> > run only on those
Le 05/10/11 21:07, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
Hi Mathias,
>
> Of course that would probably mean that our Linux version won't run out
> of the box on most Linux machines as the old OOo version did. It will
> run only on those computers that have compatible versions of all
> libraries installed in t
2011/10/5 Andrea Pescetti
> On 04/10/2011 23:58 RGB ES wrote:
>
>> I can see a big problem coming: with every single Linux distro using LibO
>> for the foreseeable future and considering the fact that nobody will build
>> OOo at home (specially on windows), if, say, next year somebody install
>>
On 05.10.2011 02:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
It seems the question remains if vanilla AOOo can link against copy-left
system libraries.
Exactly. And moreover, which libraries can be named "system" libraries.
IMHO gtk can, but librsvg can't. Don't know about GStreamer.
Regards,
Mathias
On 05.10.2011 02:46, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:12:09PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
The GStreamer integration doesn't make sense without
GStreamer - so we
shouldn't build it when no GStreamer libs are available.
Agreed.
We decided that configure without switches
bject: Re: GStreamer avmedia plugin as copyleft?
http://www.enlightenment.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 10/5/11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
This was a subject I didn't want to bring in just yet, but
if it does happen that linking them is an issue, there are
replacements.
replacemen
http://www.enlightenment.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 10/5/11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
This was a subject I didn't want to bring in just yet, but
if it does happen that linking them is an issue, there are
replacements.
replacements? Really, what do you have in mind?
Juergen
On 04/10/2011 23:58 RGB ES wrote:
I can see a big problem coming: with every single Linux distro using LibO
for the foreseeable future and considering the fact that nobody will build
OOo at home (specially on windows), if, say, next year somebody install OOo
3.4 that will be for sure an Apache bu
On 05.10.2011 09:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>>
>> --- On Tue, 10/4/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>> it seems you miss my point here.
>>> If you disable building and shipping GStreamer because it
>>> links against copy-left sys
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> --- On Tue, 10/4/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> ...
> >
> > it seems you miss my point here.
> > If you disable building and shipping GStreamer because it
> > links against copy-left system libs, then you should
> > remove the VCL plugi
--- On Tue, 10/4/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
...
>
> it seems you miss my point here.
> If you disable building and shipping GStreamer because it
> links against copy-left system libs, then you should
> remove the VCL plugins too (AFAIK gtk is LGPL, I'm not
> sure about Qt/KDE).
>
Oh .. i
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> > but we are talking here about the GStreamer *plugin*. Just
> > like the gtk and kde VLC plugins, they have Oracle license,
> > and they are in the software grant, this means they (will)
> > have Apache License.
> >
>
>
--- On Tue, 10/4/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile
>
> but we are talking here about the GStreamer *plugin*. Just
> like the gtk and kde VLC plugins, they have Oracle license,
> and they are in the software grant, this means they (will)
> have Apache License.
>
We can ship the AL2 source code and pe
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:12:09PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> > The GStreamer integration doesn't make sense without
> > GStreamer - so we
> > shouldn't build it when no GStreamer libs are available.
> >
>
> Agreed.
>
> > We decided that configure without switches should be the
> > default Ap
Hello Mathias,
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:28:06PM +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Am 04.10.2011 17:27, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > The GStreamer avmedia plugin is disabled when copyleft is disabled (the
> > default in AOOo).
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/oo
--- On Tue, 10/4/11, RGB ES wrote:
...
>
> Sorry for jumping into the discussion ;)
> I can see a big problem coming: with every single Linux
> distro using LibO for the foreseeable future and
> considering the fact that nobody will build
> OOo at home (specially on windows), if, say, next year
>
--- On Tue, 10/4/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> The GStreamer integration doesn't make sense without
> GStreamer - so we
> shouldn't build it when no GStreamer libs are available.
>
Agreed.
> We decided that configure without switches should be the
> default Apache build. OTOH we didn't ag
2011/10/4 Mathias Bauer
> Am 04.10.2011 17:27, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > The GStreamer avmedia plugin is disabled when copyleft is disabled (the
> > default in AOOo).
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/configure.in?view=markup#l1248
> > I cann
Am 04.10.2011 17:27, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi there,
>
> The GStreamer avmedia plugin is disabled when copyleft is disabled (the
> default in AOOo).
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/configure.in?view=markup#l1248
> I cannot understand why this is treated as copy
Hi there,
The GStreamer avmedia plugin is disabled when copyleft is disabled (the
default in AOOo).
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/configure.in?view=markup#l1248
I cannot understand why this is treated as copy-left code. The plugin
was developed by Oracle and is on the soft
20 matches
Mail list logo
