Since people have been wondering about the various websites, here's a
brief explanation:
* Apache OpenOffice.org Podling public homepage
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
This is the official homepage of the Podling. It is typically what
would become the official homepage of the Proj
Hi Kay
Am 23.06.11 17:42, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
You already are a contributor! You sent this email!
Please join the Community Wiki -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home
h...well OK, I didn't think I could actu
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> You already are a contributor! You sent this email!
>
> Please join the Community Wiki -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home
>
h...well OK, I didn't think I could actually edit anything! Well I'll
send the ICL
Hi,
I have confirm receiving from secretary My signed ICLA at the moment.
I want to be a active commiter. I can do all items from You list. Web
programming is something what I do in Job (as C++ programmer I work
only 3 months, of course I do it too if this needed). At the moment I
need to know wh
It does seem that we have a bit of housekeeping to do before we start
defining and dividing sub-projects.
With that being said, I'd like to point out that language and culture
will naturally recreate similar structures as the 'old' NLCs in the
previous OOo structure. A project like OpenOffice.org
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Grzegorz Rajda wrote:
> 3 master groups is enough to create efficiently best office software.
> We can easy visual this as flow and apply on creating new structure.
>
I think a "flat" project structure like that may be a good idea. But
I think that for now it
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Well, as someone who has been involved in the project for about 10 yrs
> now...I LIKE your picture, but I wonder how it actually fleshes out given
> what we have to work with on the Apache site now.
I don't know if this idea impacts on the site
You already are a contributor! You sent this email!
Please join the Community Wiki -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home
We have started to outline plans there. No ICLA required for that Wiki.
> Well, as someone who has been involved in the project for about 10 yrs
>
Well, as someone who has been involved in the project for about 10 yrs
now...I LIKE your picture, but I wonder how it actually fleshes out given
what we have to work with on the Apache site now.
I am going to apply as an Apache contributor and hope I can at least make a
few small changes to the cu
On Jun 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Jomar Silva wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to present that, and seeing
> that I'm still learning The Apache Way, I'll try :)
>
> I've published a few days ago at my blog an idea about what I believe
> we could aim as the architecture of Apache OOo.
No apologies needed. I am just saying that we are starting by doing work and
that work required that we build an initial foundation.
We promise to listen to the community your points may or may not be an accurate
prediction of the future. We'll see!
> Apologise me, I don't want accuse of someth
I'm not sure if this is the right place to present that, and seeing
that I'm still learning The Apache Way, I'll try :)
I've published a few days ago at my blog an idea about what I believe
we could aim as the architecture of Apache OOo. I believe that this
could help us to organize the project, t
Apologise me, I don't want accuse of something You or the PPMC
community. I have very big respect for You and people in this group.
Of course I won't help as I can at the moment. We can discuss parallel
to migration process. Of course this need very much time and work. Any
discuss need this too.
Grzegorz,
What have we accomplished in 9 days?
People are going through the grant to find what's missing, there were a large
number of emails on ooo-dev since last Monday.
We have a Wiki (2 actually) and we have a project website, these are skeletons
that people are beginning to populate.
We
Hi,
This is best time to talk about goals. Migrating to new infrastructure
is best time to hard thinking about whole project.
In my base conception we should use minimal structure for new OOo. In
my level this should view like that:
1. users (they don't know anythings except release version progr
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Grzegorz Rajda wrote:
>> Good evening,
>>
>> All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key Schenk. I
>> wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What You think about
>> that?
>>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Grzegorz Rajda wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key Schenk. I
> wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What You think about
> that?
>
> Last changes in infrastructure (Oracle, LibreOffice etc.
Grzegorz Rajda schrieb:
> Good evening,
>
> All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key
> Schenk. I wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What
> You think about that?
>
> Last changes in infrastructure (Oracle, LibreOffice etc.) needs from us
> new goals to
Good evening,
All write this to other mailing-list as response to mail from Key
Schenk. I wan't discus this with You and back to OOo development. What
You think about that?
Last changes in infrastructure (Oracle, LibreOffice etc.) needs from us
new goals to create reborn release of OOo. I ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
