There are many details to figure out to have a maintenance release of
OpenOffice.org 3.3.0.
This situation reminds me that here have been privately-produced and
distributed editions of OpenOffice.org.
The ones in my experience were produced by Novell. They tracked *existing*
OpenOffice.org re
It's not at all obvious to me why one couldn't just take a LibreOffice release
such as 3.4, created from the same source outside the Apache community, and
apply the same logic to it as is being applied to this 3.3.1 proposal. With the
added bonus that no-one much has to do any work apart from ch
On Nov 26, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> It's not at all obvious to me why one couldn't just take a LibreOffice
> release such as 3.4, created from the same source outside the Apache
> community, and apply the same logic
No official response has been given to this proposal. Any "logi
Hi Rob,
I really didn't know what to think about Dennis's email. It seems peripheral to
the issue.
On Nov 26, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> It's not at all obvious to me why one couldn't just take a LibreOffice
>> release such as 3.
: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 07:53
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OO.o 3.3.1 Maintenance Release Consideration
Hi Rob,
I really didn't know what to think about Dennis's email. It seems peripheral to
the issue.
On Nov 26, 2011, at
onfirming that I
> and some others are humorless [;<).
I choose to take your humor as very subtle. There is so much happening ...
let's not be afraid to make mistakes ... forward progress is being made.
Best Regards,
Dave
>
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message--
