On Jun 20, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Dave Fisher wrote:
>> We certainly need a plan that does not simply stop openoffice.org
>> email.
>
> Actually, as others said I would just keep the @openoffice.org addresses
> running; to address a concern, I've used mine for many thousands
Dave Fisher wrote:
> We certainly need a plan that does not simply stop openoffice.org
> email.
Actually, as others said I would just keep the @openoffice.org addresses
running; to address a concern, I've used mine for many thousands of
OOo-related actions and nobody ever questioned if I was speak
...@baseanswers.com]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 14:33
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oh, let's not forget @openoffice.org too
[ ... ]
There is the need for the phpBB system to have access to an SMTP server
and a single administrative email account. I can give details about that
on the
le under the GPL. The URI is
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/ucp.php?mode=register and its
title is "Register * User Control Panel"
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 14:00
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oh,
Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
>> service with how Apache projects work.
>>
>> Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
>> representing the project,or at th
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
> Op 20-6-2011 14:33, Rob Weir schreef:
>
> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
>> service with how Apache projects work.
>>
>> Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
>> representing the
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
> service with how Apache projects work.
>
> Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
> representing the project,or at the very least is a member of the
> p
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 14:00 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>
> > On 20.06.2011 14:33, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
> >> service with how Apache projects work.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> An
On Jun 20, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 20.06.2011 14:33, Rob Weir wrote:
>> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
>> service with how Apache projects work.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> And remember, committers are given email forwards via an a.o email
>> add
On 20.06.2011 14:33, Rob Weir wrote:
I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
service with how Apache projects work.
[...]
And remember, committers are given email forwards via an a.o email
address. So there is no functional requirement that I can see for an
OOo ad
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:33:55 -0400:
> I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
> service with how Apache projects work.
For what it's worth: subversion.org and spamassassin.org are also
controlled by (members of?) the respective PMCs.
For subversion
Op 20-6-2011 14:33, Rob Weir schreef:
I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
service with how Apache projects work.
Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
representing the project,or at the very least is a member of the
project. But we speak
I'm having difficulty reconciling the openoffice.org email forwarding
service with how Apache projects work.
Having such an address appears to suggest that the person is
representing the project,or at the very least is a member of the
project. But we speak as individuals, both in the project and
On 6/19/2011 11:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:(1) Transfer domain.(Is
the Foundation handling this? Anything needed from the project?)
- ownership from Oracle to ASF.
This is currently in process. And it includes multiple *openoffic
On Jun 19, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>> The Wiki is taking some time. I propose we publish a "Transition" page for
>>> the website where we communicate the many transition t
On Jun 19, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> The Wiki is taking some time. I propose we publish a "Transition" page for
>> the website where we communicate the many transition topics involved and the
>> current status.
>
> Do we hav
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> The Wiki is taking some time. I propose we publish a "Transition" page for
> the website where we communicate the many transition topics involved and the
> current status.
Do we have an ETA on the wiki?
-Rob
On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I am not certain this is identified as something to deal with.
>
> Along with the openoffice.org domain and whatever happens with that, there is
> also the openoffice.org affinity e-mail forwarding operation.
>
> Is there anything in
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I am not certain this is identified as something to deal with.
>
> Along with the openoffice.org domain and whatever happens with that, there is
> also the openoffice.org affinity e-mail forwarding operation.
>
> Is there anything in place to sustain that?
>
> Migh
I am not certain this is identified as something to deal with.
Along with the openoffice.org domain and whatever happens with that, there is
also the openoffice.org affinity e-mail forwarding operation.
Is there anything in place to sustain that?
Might it be interrupted or even retired at som
20 matches
Mail list logo
