KG01 - see comments inline
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler
> >
> wrote:
> > I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
> > LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
> > own lists. I su
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
> LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
> own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory
> posts that are anti-LO on our lists
On 6 June 2012 13:13, Ross Gardler wrote:
> PPMC who agree with me to consider
> sending a polite but firm request to stay focused on helping users on
> the ooo-users list."
>
+1 let's be the ones acting like grown ups.
> Ross
>
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)
On 6 June 2012 13:06, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
>> LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
>> own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inf
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
> LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
> own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory
> posts that are anti-LO on our lists
+1000
2012/6/6 Ross Gardler
> I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
> LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
> own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory
> posts that are anti-LO on our lists.
>
> For example, a r
On 6 June 2012 12:24, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I suggest that the ooo-users list is not the place for these kinds of
> opinions, regardless of their validity.
Thank you to the kind soul who pointed out how easy it is to offend in
these sensitive matters. The above should have said "regardless of
the
Hi.
2012/6/6 Ross Gardler :
> I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
> LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
> own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory
> posts that are anti-LO on our lists.
>
> For example, a rec
I move that there is no need to continue to fuel the fires of AOO vs
LO. The PPMC is now effective at ignoring anti-AOO materials on our
own lists. I suggest the PPMC should further silence inflammatory
posts that are anti-LO on our lists.
For example, a recent post on ooo-users said:
"The LO guy
