Hi Drew,
Back in March I sent an email to 102 contact references for that mirror
network, it would be a good idea IMO to drop another note to these
folks, let them know we recognize the traffic they are still carrying,
say thanks and keep in touch as the projects looks to, and plans for the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:40 PM, drew jensen
drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
Also in this case one picture worths 1000 words, Rob keeps doing a
fantastic job using
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Roberto Galoppini rgalopp...@geek.net wrote:
It's good to see we find a way to use both mirror networks. Beyond the
big numbers at stake, I think it we were right by setting a clear rule
about who serves which downloads (AOO 3.4, legacy).
MirrorBrain has
Hi,
It looks like the current instance is running on an Oracle server at
Santa Clara, CA, USA:
download.services.openoffice.org (192.9.173.38)
Are going to have an own mirrorbrain instance here with Apache
infrastructure? Otherwise it's like keeping the mirrors net without
the underlying
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
It's also encouraging to see the half million downloads per month still
going out from the
n Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
wrote:
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
It's also encouraging to
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 09:26 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:40 PM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
wrote:
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
It's also encouraging to see the
2012/6/29 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
If we want to use MirrorBrain longer term it would probably be good to
have a ooo-mirrors list, or something like that, so we can have
bidirectional communications. It would be a low-traffic list, but it
would be better for the operators to join a
Rob Weir wrote:
If we want to use MirrorBrain longer term it would probably be good to
have a ooo-mirrors list ...
Or maybe broaden it to an ooo-distributors list
Good idea, and this ooo-distributors list would have a clear focus, so
there's no risk it will overlap with ooo-dev.
And I also
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
It's also encouraging to see the half million downloads per month still
going out from the mirrorbrain servers - this 500,000 p/mos figure is
comprised of older releases, many of
On 6/28/12 11:40 PM, drew jensen wrote:
Howdy,
It is wonderful to see the millions of downloads for the current 3.4
release, utilizing the sf.net resources.
It's also encouraging to see the half million downloads per month still
going out from the mirrorbrain servers - this 500,000 p/mos
11 matches
Mail list logo
