More to the point, we first need the AOOo PPMC on ooo-dev@ or similar to
come up with some specific branding proposals, at which point we can
then take those specific proposals to trademarks@ and/or Legal to get
specific legal feedback on that proposal.
One thing I have learned from participat
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Michael Adams wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2011 15:56, Michael Acevedo wrote:
>> My proposal in simple words is either 2 of the following options:
>>
>> * Make the first Apache OpenOffice.org release get the 4.0 name as
>> it is basically a new and mostly rew
On Friday 28 October 2011 15:56, Michael Acevedo wrote:
> My proposal in simple words is either 2 of the following options:
>
> * Make the first Apache OpenOffice.org release get the 4.0 name as
> it is basically a new and mostly rewritten version of the current
> OOo source code. or
>
>
- Original Message -
> From: David H. Lipman
> To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2011 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
> From: "Reizinger Zoltán"
>
>> 2011.
From: "Reizinger Zoltán"
> 2011.10.28. 5:37 keltezéssel, David H. Lipman írta:
>> From: "Terry"
>>
>>> Hi, floris
>>>
>>>
>>> I mistook David's email as one on the marketing mail list. The topic of
>>> re-branding
>>> is
>>> being discussed there. I was about to suggest people subscribe to th
on the download page.
The new openoffice.org is coming together on Apache Infrastructure. More
details next week.
Regards,
Dave
>
>
>
>
>> ________________
>> From: floris v
>> To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, 28 October 2
2011.10.28. 5:37 keltezéssel, David H. Lipman írta:
From: "Terry"
Hi, floris
I mistook David's email as one on the marketing mail list. The topic of
re-branding is
being discussed there. I was about to suggest people subscribe to that list
but I
noticed
while composing this reply that an
;To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 2:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>From: "Terry"
>
>> Hi, floris
>>
>>
>> I mistook David's email as one on the marketing mail list. The t
>From: Terry
>To: "ooo-users@incubator.apache.org" ; David
>H. Lipman
>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 5:52 PM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>I do not understand the point Michael made in that email.
On 10/27/2011 10:56 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
My proposal in simple words is either 2 of the following options:
/snip option 1/
* Drop the version number from the Apache OpenOffice.org name.
I think, I will add a third option here, drop the ".org" suffix and go simply with Apache OpenOffic
From: "Michael Acevedo"
> My proposal in simple words is either 2 of the following options:
> * Make the first Apache OpenOffice.org release get the 4.0 name as it is
> basically a
> new
> and mostly rewritten version of the current OOo source code. or
>
> * Drop the version number from the A
From: "Terry"
> Hi, floris
>
>
> I mistook David's email as one on the marketing mail list. The topic of
> re-branding is
> being discussed there. I was about to suggest people subscribe to that list
> but I
> noticed
> while composing this reply that an email I sent to the list has just bee
2011 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
I do not understand the point Michael made in that email. Is he suggesting
that no version number be used?
Terry
>
>From: David H. Lipman
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.
ad page.
>
>From: floris v
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 9:38 AM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>Op 27-10-2011 23:52, Terry schreef:
>> I do not understand the
tor.apache.org; Terry
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 10:49 AM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Terry wrote:
>> Hi, floris
>>
>>
>> I mistook David's email as one on the marketing mail list.
;>From: floris v
>>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 9:38 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>>
>>Op 27-10-2011 23:52, Terry schreef:
>>> I do not un
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 9:38 AM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>Op 27-10-2011 23:52, Terry schreef:
>> I do not understand the point Michael made in that email. Is he suggesting
>> t
: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
From: "Michael Acevedo"
Hi,
I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the Apache OOo
team in
completing the transition of the source code earlier this month. As for my
proposal, it
stems from one stateme
I do not understand the point Michael made in that email. Is he suggesting
that no version number be used?
Terry
>
>From: David H. Lipman
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 28 October 2011 1:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] C
Sorry, a typo in the address. It should be:
ooo-marketing-subscr...@incubator.apache.org
-Rob
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> A quick announcement: We just created yesterday a new marketing
> mailing list for the project. They are also discussing the AOOo
> branding issues
A quick announcement: We just created yesterday a new marketing
mailing list for the project. They are also discussing the AOOo
branding issues there. If you have an interest in the topic, and
related marketing topics, I invite you to join that list, where you
would be most welcome.
To join, s
From: "Michael Acevedo"
> Hi,
>
> I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the Apache
> OOo team in
> completing the transition of the source code earlier this month. As for my
> proposal, it
> stems from one statement made in the OpenOffice.org Forums indicating that
>
Thanks for the proposal and the discussions in this thread. Apache
projects certainly appreciate input from users!
The decision for future product naming has already been brought up on
the ooo-dev@ list a number of times, and I expect in the near future the
PPMC will dive into it for a final
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 12:26 AM, Doug wrote:
>
>> On 10/24/2011 11:04 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the
>>> Apache OOo team in completing the transition of the source code earlie
ots of folks do say
"Hadoop."
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
Regards.
From: Alan Lord (News)
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
On 25/10/11 07:22,
great day!
Patrick
Regards.
From: Alan Lord (News)
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
On 25/10/11 07:22, Terry wrote:
I agree that the '.org' c
ws)
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011 5:55 PM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>On 25/10/11 07:22, Terry wrote:
>> I agree that the '.org' can be dropped now. It had to be used previously
>>
On 25/10/11 07:22, Terry wrote:
I agree that the '.org' can be dropped now. It had to be used previously
because someone else owns the name 'OpenOffice' but the software could now be
named something like 'Apache Office'. The subject has been mentioned in
comments on the blog and in the ooo-d
v list where the decision will presumably
be made.
Regards, Terry
>
>From: Doug
>To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Tuesday, 25 October 2011 3:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [Proposal] Change in Apache OpenOffice.org Branding...
>
>On 10/25/2
On 10/25/2011 12:26 AM, Doug wrote:
On 10/24/2011 11:04 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the
Apache OOo team in completing the transition of the source code
earlier this month. As for my proposal, it stems from one statement
made
On 10/24/2011 11:04 PM, Michael Acevedo wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the Apache OOo team in completing
the transition of the source code earlier this month. As for my proposal, it stems from one
statement made in the OpenOffice.org Forums indicatin
Hi,
I have been reading the OOo forum and first let me congratulate the Apache OOo
team in completing the transition of the source code earlier this month. As for
my proposal, it stems from one statement made in the OpenOffice.org Forums
indicating that "Fundamentally, as a project "OpenOffice.
32 matches
Mail list logo
