Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:03 PM, John Boyle wrote: > : And you did NOT bother to read what was said, Yes, I read what you said, and the whole thread. My point was that at some point you highlighted that AOO was "not worth the trouble" and that your option was moving to LibreOffice. That, on a AOO

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread John Boyle
On 5/15/2012 11:27 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, John Boyle wrote: !:-( :-( =-O =-O You are angry and use lots of caps and want to vent your frustration using lots of exclamation marks. Fine. But that doesn´t mean you have right to spread lies ("AOO is a total rew

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread Fernando Cassia
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, John Boyle wrote: > !:-( :-( =-O =-O You are angry and use lots of caps and want to vent your frustration using lots of exclamation marks. Fine. But that doesn´t mean you have right to spread lies ("AOO is a total rewrite"). If you want to use LibreOffice, fine,

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread Rod Lockwood
On Tue, 15 May 2012 13:36:39 -0400, John Boyle wrote: On 5/15/2012 5:59 AM, Rod Lockwood wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:32:16 -0400, John Boyle wrote: On 5/13/2012 5:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: John Boyle wrote: "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY OUT! It is obvious to me that it

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread John Boyle
On 5/15/2012 5:59 AM, Rod Lockwood wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:32:16 -0400, John Boyle wrote: On 5/13/2012 5:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: John Boyle wrote: "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY OUT! It is obvious to me that it is NOT an "UPGRADE" but a COMPLETE REWRITE It is not a com

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread Rod Lockwood
On Mon, 14 May 2012 20:17:30 -0400, Scooter C wrote: Good Evening Mr. Hart, I take acception to your statement. If not for Microsoft (MS) /WE/ wouldn't be here. I started out on an Apple IIe, but it couldn't run AutoCad, next was an Amiga in the 80s and an infant TurboCad which at the time

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-15 Thread Rod Lockwood
On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:32:16 -0400, John Boyle wrote: On 5/13/2012 5:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: John Boyle wrote: "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY OUT! It is obvious to me that it is NOT an "UPGRADE" but a COMPLETE REWRITE It is not a complete rewrite. Virtually all the existing

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-14 Thread Scooter C
Good Evening Mr. Hart, I take acception to your statement. If not for Microsoft (MS) /WE/ wouldn't be here. I started out on an Apple IIe, but it couldn't run AutoCad, next was an Amiga in the 80s and an infant TurboCad which at the time was Open source. The Amiga disappeared (a German graphics

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-14 Thread John Hart
On 5/14/2012 12:32 PM, John Boyle wrote: To Andrea: If it was simply an upgrade, as all others in that line up to version 3.3 were upgrades, then you would not have to go in and completely rearrange what you have on your computer to that install an ALMOST completely different version of the p

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-14 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-05-14 1:32 PM John Boyle wrote: To Andrea: If it was simply an upgrade, as all others in that line up to version 3.3 were upgrades, then you would not have to go in and completely rearrange what you have on your computer to that install an ALMOST completely different version of the prog

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-14 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, John Boyle wrote: > On 5/13/2012 5:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >> John Boyle wrote: >>> >>> "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY >>> OUT! It is obvious to me that it is NOT an "UPGRADE" but a COMPLETE >>> REWRITE >> >> >> It is not a complete rewrite. Virtua

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-14 Thread John Boyle
On 5/13/2012 5:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: John Boyle wrote: "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY OUT! It is obvious to me that it is NOT an "UPGRADE" but a COMPLETE REWRITE It is not a complete rewrite. Virtually all the existing 3.3 code is still there; new code has been added, many bug

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
John Boyle wrote: "UPGRADING" TO AOO VER. 3.4 is TOTALLY OUT! It is obvious to me that it is NOT an "UPGRADE" but a COMPLETE REWRITE It is not a complete rewrite. Virtually all the existing 3.3 code is still there; new code has been added, many bugs fixed and some third-party libraries (not p

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-13 Thread John Boyle
On 5/13/2012 11:57 AM, M Henri Day wrote: 2012/5/13 John Gregson Henri. I believe that this problem is solved. I'll past in a message that I sent to to the List a few days ago. --**--** --**- This u

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-13 Thread M Henri Day
2012/5/13 John Gregson > Henri. > > I believe that this problem is solved. > I'll past in a message that I sent to to the List a few days ago. > --**--** > --**- > This us an update of the problem that

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-13 Thread John Gregson
Henri. I believe that this problem is solved. I'll past in a message that I sent to to the List a few days ago. --- This us an update of the problem that I was having. I am using Win 7-32 Again my

Re: Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-13 Thread M Henri Day
2012/5/10 John Gregson > I've reported this problem before. > I am using Win 7-32. > > I had OO 3.3 on computer, then installed the 3.4 upgrade file. > Many problems; tried a fresh install, no change. > Uninstalled OO 3.3 and 3.4 > > Hagar tried to help with some detailed instructions, but they a

Open Office 3.4 problems

2012-05-10 Thread John Gregson
I've reported this problem before. I am using Win 7-32. I had OO 3.3 on computer, then installed the 3.4 upgrade file. Many problems; tried a fresh install, no change. Uninstalled OO 3.3 and 3.4 Hagar tried to help with some detailed instructions, but they are too complicated for my limited comp