Dan Carter wrote:
> Jack, I have a pair of Ultra 20's on which I plan to install ooRexx. Is
> there anything not obvious that I should know? I also have a SPARC
> server that will want to place it on, as well, but that is far into the
> future. All three machines are SOL10.
>
I believe 3.2.
Jack, I have a pair of Ultra 20's on which I plan to install ooRexx. Is
there anything not obvious that I should know? I also have a SPARC
server that will want to place it on, as well, but that is far into the
future. All three machines are SOL10.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Woehr
Moritz Hoffmann wrote:
> Jack Woehr wrote:
>
>> Plodding along in the background at compiling 4.0 on Solaris
>>
> Is this Solaris for x86 or SPARC?
>
x86 ... I have two (old) Sparc machines, both running OpenBSD. They're a bit
slow for developing ObjectRexx. My Solaris for x86 is from
Ok, check in the tests and open a bug report.
Rick
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:40 PM, David Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> No, it's not, for the same reason that methods don't have the
>> ContextVariable calls. The "reach back into the caller's variable
>> space" par
Rick McGuire wrote:
> No, it's not, for the same reason that methods don't have the
> ContextVariable calls. The "reach back into the caller's variable
> space" paradigm is really an old style model that I'm trying to keep
> out of the new object oriented model. Of course, having a method tes
No, it's not, for the same reason that methods don't have the
ContextVariable calls. The "reach back into the caller's variable
space" paradigm is really an old style model that I'm trying to keep
out of the new object oriented model. Of course, having a method test
that demonstrates this is
Rick -
Is the RexxVariablePool API callable from a C++ method. I get a return
code of RXSHV_NOAVL when I call it from a C++ method.
David Ashley
ooRexx Team
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Develope
David Ruggles wrote:
> retc = SockSetSockOpt(s, 'SOL_SOCKET', 'SO_RCVTIMEO', 180) -- 3 minutes
>
> This returns zero on windows but sockaccept still doesn't time out; on Linux
> it returns -1 with an error code of 22 which is "Invalid Argument"
>
> It didn't work with the class either.
>
> Thanks,
Jack Woehr wrote:
> Plodding along in the background at compiling 4.0 on Solaris
>
> * had to #include in
> rexxapi/common/platform/unix/SysCSStream.hpp for bcopy()
> * think also it needs -lxnet.so to link
Is this Solaris for x86 or SPARC?
Regards
--
Moritz Hoffmann
http://a
retc = SockSetSockOpt(s, 'SOL_SOCKET', 'SO_RCVTIMEO', 180) -- 3 minutes
This returns zero on windows but sockaccept still doesn't time out; on Linux
it returns -1 with an error code of 22 which is "Invalid Argument"
It didn't work with the class either.
Thanks,
David Ruggles
CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA
Dan Carter wrote:
>
> Jack, thanks for your running commentary on installing ooRexx 4.0 on
> solaris. I am not an experienced Solaris anything, but I will install
> 4.0 on my Solaris boxes as soon as I can. Your notes will be most
> helpful.
>
"Install" is too fine a word for where I've gotte
David Ruggles wrote:
> How would I specify a timeout? Sockaccept doesn't seem to have an argument
> for timeout.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Ruggles
> CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+
> Network Engineer Safe Data, Inc.
> (910) 285-7200[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David A
Jack, thanks for your running commentary on installing ooRexx 4.0 on
solaris. I am not an experienced Solaris anything, but I will install
4.0 on my Solaris boxes as soon as I can. Your notes will be most
helpful.
_
From: Jack Woehr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Octo
How would I specify a timeout? Sockaccept doesn't seem to have an argument
for timeout.
Thanks,
David Ruggles
CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+
Network EngineerSafe Data, Inc.
(910) 285-7200 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: David Ashley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
David Ruggles wrote:
> I saw that Mark modified the socket samples to include the shebang line so
> you can execute them on Linux.
>
> Well I realized I hadn't tested them on Linux so I have started to do that.
> I ran in to an issue, but I don't know if it is something we can fix or not.
>
> When
I saw that Mark modified the socket samples to include the shebang line so
you can execute them on Linux.
Well I realized I hadn't tested them on Linux so I have started to do that.
I ran in to an issue, but I don't know if it is something we can fix or not.
When you issue a sockaccept it will ha
Plodding along in the background at compiling 4.0 on Solaris
* had to #include in
rexxapi/common/platform/unix/SysCSStream.hpp for bcopy()
* think also it needs -lxnet.so to link
--
Jack J. Woehr# "Self-delusion is
http://www.well.com/~jax # half the battle!"
http://www.
17 matches
Mail list logo
