Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposition for better image quality in PDF documentation

2009-12-09 Thread Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
Hey, It looks really good! Jon 2009/12/9 Jean-Louis Faucher > Jon > > Thanks for the odg files. > > You can have a look at the build 5396 on the build machine : in oodialog, > dlgArea looks great page 423 :-) > > For sample1, I extracted the png and refer it directly : the pdf format > does no

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposition for better image quality in PDF documentation

2009-12-09 Thread David Ashley
I took a look at you new rxsock.pdf file. And I am VERY pleased with the results. The image objects look much more crisp with no fuzziness at all. Very nice. David Ashley On 12/08/2009 05:39 PM, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote: Tested with the build machine, rxsock.pdf looks good except the empty ar

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Little problem in SysThread.cpp

2009-12-09 Thread David Ashley
Rainer - I believe your analysis is correct. Go ahead an make the change. David Ashley On 12/09/2009 01:23 AM, Rainer Tammer wrote: > Hello, > I think that there is a small problem in ooRexx 4.0 trunk: > > common/platform/unix/SysThread.cpp > > ... > // create a new thread and attach to an activ

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposition for better image quality in PDF documentation

2009-12-09 Thread Jean-Louis Faucher
Jon Thanks for the odg files. You can have a look at the build 5396 on the build machine : in oodialog, dlgArea looks great page 423 :-) For sample1, I extracted the png and refer it directly : the pdf format does not bring more quality here (bitmap). Jean-Louis