This sounds like a very useful extra string to ooRexx's bow.
Jon
On 13 March 2010 16:53, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> That's an interesting idea.
>
> I haven't given much thought to it yet. But I think the
> OLEObjectEvent COM object has laid some of the ground work for this.
> That object already a
That's an interesting idea.
I haven't given much thought to it yet. But I think the
OLEObjectEvent COM object has laid some of the ground work for this.
That object already allows OLE objects to call into Rexx and takes a
Rexx object and returns it (transformed to an OLE object.)
I'm not saying
The recent question about calling Rexx scripts from Excel makes me
wonder if something like what Rony did with BSF4Rexx might be possible
with the OLE object support. Right now, the OLE object support starts
with Rexx and goes out to the OLE objects. It might be nice to go the
other way. For exa
