[Oorexx-devel] make rpm Command Broken

2010-04-27 Thread David Ashley
All - the make rpm command is broken in the trunk. It appears that not all the source files are being zipped up before being copied to the rpm subdir. This also means that there will be missing files in a zip to tar archive. I am tracing this down but if you have recently added files to the

[Oorexx-devel] Fwd: make rpm Command Broken

2010-04-27 Thread David Ashley
It looks like the include statement for the message number header file has been somehow removed from the mix. I am getting undefined error messages all over the place like this. In file included from ./interpreter/runtime/RexxCore.h:273, from

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: make rpm Command Broken

2010-04-27 Thread Rick McGuire
Was the include file somehow generated as an empty file? Rick On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:47 PM, David Ashley david.ashley@gmail.comwrote: It looks like the include statement for the message number header file has been somehow removed from the mix. I am getting undefined error messages all

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: make rpm Command Broken

2010-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:47 AM, David Ashley david.ashley@gmail.comwrote: It looks like the include statement for the message number header file has been somehow removed from the mix. I am getting undefined error messages all over the place like this. What happens is, if you do a make

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fwd: make rpm Command Broken

2010-04-27 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:47 AM, David Ashley david.ashley@gmail.com wrote: It looks like the include statement for the message number header file has been somehow removed from the mix. I am getting undefined error

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Grammar II

2010-04-27 Thread Tony Harminc
On 26 April 2010 03:51, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com wrote: Parsing (oo)Rexx is hard. The reason for this is that a symbol can be a symbol or a keyword, depending on the context. Have a look at the following example:  [snip] Yes, that's correct (NetRexx makes it a bit more regular, in