On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
wrote:
>
> I can't offer you much on this, but you ask
>
> On 28 May 2010 17:24, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>>
> ...
>>
>> 2.) This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is different
>> behavior. Is it sufficiently different to be a problem?
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
wrote:
> I can't think of any other way around this problem than
> through the loophole you are proposing to close.
Well, I can think of a number of ways, as could Rony.
Here is a concrete example, it runs on both 3.2.0 ooDialog and wit
Hi Jon,
> I can't think of any other way around this problem than through the
> loophole you are proposing to close.
another possibility would be as follows (very sketchy):
* create a worker method, that runs unguarded in its own thread,
establishes the contact via RexxSQL and goes int
